Emerald, Habachtal, Austria. Credit: Lang Antiques
It has been about a week since I wrote this. I can’t (and won't) edit it at this point.
---------------------------------------------
I have to hand it to the Saint Petersburg State University. They have a couple of courses on Coursea:
The Introduction to Quantum Computing
https://www.coursera.org/learn/quantum-computing-algorithms/home/welcome
Physical Basics of Quantum Computing
https://www.coursera.org/learn/physical-basis-quantum-computing/home/welcome
These courses are actually really good. I really like the Russian attitude to QP and QC (Notation QP: quantum physics QC: Quantum computing). It seems to me that they are way more comfortable treating speculative theories and interpretations as main line investigation routes. It does seem that they have had this kind of attitude for some time; they started investigating psi intelligence applications before the rest of the world did. When they approached the many world theory in The Introduction to Quantum Computing it was just another thing to learn, but all the other countries’ attitudes seem to be scared of it. I will also pass along here some other great resources I have found for free QC and QP education.
Another Coursea:
Exploring Quantum Physics (University of Maryland)
https://www.coursera.org/learn/quantum-physics/home/welcome
MIT open course ware Graduate and undergraduate courses in everything quantum
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/find-by-topic/#cat=science&subcat=physics&spec=quantummechanics
You tube: Qiskit (IBM). New research; high quality lectures.
https://www.youtube.com/qiskit
This particular video: The Multiverse Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics https://www.coursera.org/learn/quantum-computing-algorithms/lecture/IOoff/the-multiverse-interpretation-of-quantum-mechanics seeded my current thought.
So, what the lecturer went through is the many world’s theory. I’m not sure I agree with everything said but kudos for presenting it as regular material. The general assumption of it is that even if something is in a sealed box observing the actualised potential of a thing, the observer and the observed thing is still in a superposition in relation to an observer outside the box who can’t see anything. This seems to conflict with the interpretation of “observation” being a disturbance which collapses a wave function. This is a little constructivist in that it is saying that until I see it, it is still in a superposition, no matter who else has seen it, so it is saying that collapse is relative to the person, and it isn’t objectively occurring regardless. From my own position, it looks like both things are going on to certain degrees. I mean if it IS the case that it can still be in a superposition even after it has been observed, then the only reason it would be doing so is if it can possibly collapse into a different state, or it would have already collapsed.
So CAN it change after already having been observed? The Mandela Effect seems to suggest that it can. Let’s just paint a picture here: so a number of people observe a wave function collapse into a certain state and they are in a sealed box. Then let’s say a larger amount of people then see what’s inside that box but when they do, the wave function collapses into a different state, perhaps in response to interference with its potentials by their potentials, producing a different amplitude and therefore probability and collapsed state. Perhaps the larger number or the interference in general of that group overruled the smaller group - maybe only after the contents of that inner box are opened to its fullest extent does the wave function decide its form (in relation to everyone and possibly then hence, anyone) [and for those who read this entire article; it may be that the objects contained in the Mandela Effect have/had a different ‘release’ from isolation and an isolation itself which is atypical, meaning that interaction times and processes for ‘”self”interference’, observation, and wave collapse are atypical to the usual. High spec: in larger objects it may be that relativity is included such that a difference in speed, time, position, direction (whatever) of the wave function in question, in relative relation to the rest of that system, may produce the result of a difference in how the wave function collapses over time and space, that is, relative to the larger objects in that system]
One point I will argue with is that he says that the particles can “see” their other potentialities and the information from these other potentialities can be integrated thusly; because the particles are so much the same, it can be done. Well obviously they aren’t “seeing” anything, are they…. It is just that the interference takes place unto them. With larger objects, it isn’t necessary that anything be “seen” for interference be taking place, is what I would contest. The size thing comes into it here. If we are talking about differences in the object being preclusionary, then we have to notice that a larger object isn’t just “the sum of its parts” it is also the parts. There is nothing specifically there in these elementary particles to stop information being incorporated from other potentialities (other pathways). It may well be that the time and space spans are different, but I don’t see anything precluding it from taking place within these larger objects. How this interference pattern emerges in the larger object AS that larger object as the sum of its parts may just be a hell of a lot more complicated.
My feeling is, that information from other worlds (other potentialities and pathways) is incorporated into the larger object through a kind of transduction and processing, carried out by the pineal gland. Particles and their relationship in various scales to crystalline structures can use resonance to scale shit up and process it. It may very well have to be received in a usable form by the larger object as some sort of “analogue”, but it would be usable information (and once again not necessarily “seen” by the object; maths and process continue in the larger object at ridiculously difficult and complicated levels without us being necessarily aware of it)
Now, the Mandela Effect. Something happened to this information from other potential pathways, in such that it was not processed in the usual way (it would usually just be processed in the ‘usual’ way, by machinery selected for over millions of years of evolution, and not necessarily be noticed at all, except by the tradition whereby people actively get involved with it). My intuition is that it was blocked from getting back through the usual route. So, it bloody well took another one, or what would it itself be, if it couldn’t, eh? I mean if your entire structure is built on many worlds and potentialities and you can’t use that to find an alternate route out, then what’s the paper worth you’re printed on? Lol. I know. But it seems that some things are so hard to explain, they will find another suitable route.. like how I just described it. In order to fully explain my intuitions here, I DO have to go into my personal experiences, because that’s how I developed the skills to examine this stuff.
My pineal took some severe damage when I was younger. I suspect that the entire crystalline structure of it was shattered. My brain worked differently from then on. I didn’t have enough physical symptoms to require investigation (although I probably should have). I do suspect an extremely localised stroke, or perhaps just a pure destruction of a crystalline matrix. It was preceded by that high-end metallic taste people get in the back of their nose before a stroke, which is why I suspect it. I lost the ability to feel emotions for many years - any emotions at all, it was just nothingness, not even the ‘feeling’ of nothingness, no feelings at all, just bare thought, and it is extremely hard to describe with an analogue, to you. I also lost my connection to any and all other pathways…. and the reason I can get a glimpse of what is going on here is because I know what it is to have this thing and to not have this thing, whereas it is just a part of the course for everyone else, and it is not even recognised as anything other than “just naturally what I am”. By this separation taking place I can get a better look at what the object is, by its removal. Emotions did come back, but they were necessarily preaccompanied by a conscious seeing of the logical code which supports them. They had to be in logical compatibility with my entire mentality to be allowed in, because I couldn’t separate myself into an “emotional” and a “mental” thing anymore. There was no more logical inconsistency allowed between my emotions and my mind, because I WAS this logic and an inconsistency was as obvious as the sun. If I wanted a particular emotional state to be a part of myself again I had to exactly understand how it was rationally incorporated into self-support (god logic, that is the ability of an object to have temporal stability through the evolutionary process of selection through the crown species “bar” to the ability to travel useful distances in the universes off the Earth, which requires modulation of the entire manifold around you, not actually moving from A to B, so you have to have ‘entire body compatibility’ with the entire manifold to do that).
At a particular point in my journey I created an object which appears to have similar characteristics to a natural pineal gland. It was a great deal ‘accidental’ along with a great deal of intelligent design. The intuition I have is that this object acted to transduce information from my other potentiality matrices itself (kind of like an artificial organ, because mine broke). One interesting observation about this object is that it has a multilayered burn stain right through it which acted to create a visual representation of the object it landed on. You would have to go and look at the information I have on this object to fully understand what happened but let’s say it is like a ‘still shot’ of an embedding/resonance/transduction process interlaced through many dimensions. The main line ME is Berenstein to Berenstain, and even if I try to look away from this correlation (burn stain), it just keeps sitting there looking at me.
I suppose you can guess what I’m going to postulate here; that I suspect my information found another route into the system in order that it be incorporated. Not only did it no longer have the ability to get into me, anymore, it also could not be used by anyone else – I do suspect that information is shared between everyone on these things, either directly through resonances pineal to pineal or through greater crystalline structures in which they are embedded, or, simply through regular communication conscious and subconscious. It seemed to have found a route in through everyone else’s pineal, into the system, as opposed to my own. Perhaps this might be linked to a critical mass type of thing. If you think about it, as soon as mine couldn’t get through my pineal anymore, it doesn’t mean those other pathways weren’t there. And it would have appeared as a kind of hole; our emanations and potentialities interact with everyone else’s. It would have appeared IN other people's information about their trajectories, yet, the information was not being confirmed from the other end. It would be like something is there, yet not appearing in the information received.
Perhaps it would appear as some kind of interaction in that space, yet it had no traceable connection to the world in which it was manifesting. It would be like a build-up of information without a designated processing and integration portal, which would become more and more apparent over time. It seems that in order for things to, I dunno, work, the information was instead picked up by other people’s pineals and brought through, but it appears very different from their own because it is being processed non locally by them. It does appear the same over many people, though, because its origin point was local (relatively). It is from MY universe (multiverses, whatever). I really hate the fact that I can’t discuss this because people will instantly heuristically judge my postulations as ridiculous because all the other swans are white. There is nothing wrong with me saying what I am, or the postulations I am postulating. I mean you get to Australia and all of a sudden all the fucking swans are black. Who would have guessed? Eh? It doesn’t matter if someone stumbled upon the “Welcome stranger” (huge gold nugget) because they just happened to be walking that way, that day. Shit happens. Nothing I have been through is even comparable to a gold nugget, it has sucked to all high heaven.
I have always found it frustrating (to say the least).. in the way that if what I am saying is true, right…. I don’t appear in other people’s local processing of their parallels and potentials, because mine isn’t working. People use this “Sense” to FEEL out a thing and get an intuition of its truth. Rather than seeing what I am writing and saying in and of itself, people naturally go to this inner sense to get a read and don’t get what they would usually expect of a true object so I am rejected by that sense no matter WHAT I am saying. That sense is so integral in a person they can’t use their mind instead to process the information to core and I can understand why, HOWEVER, even explaining why this is so but it doesn’t mean I am not truth (the same as them) doesn’t seem able to help a person process it above and beyond their structure, shall we say. Which is exactly the point of our mind and intelligence…… So I AM appearing in their processing now, but I am appearing as a strange object, not in the usual place and the linking of my identity to this object (ME) is totally beyond the processing ability of the system; except here where I have the benefit of a direct perspective. Quite frankly, my life has been an anomaly, I am an anomaly and my brain and thinking processes are an anomaly. I challenge you to show otherwise. Lol.
At the moment I am thinking hard about whether I can construct any experiments to show any of these process or the laws which govern them. I also have an aim of trying to understand QP and QC well enough to write algorithms, because if I can learn to speak that language I have a lot of algorithms in here which I may be able to write down, but holy hell that stuff is hard. Also, it’s slightly shit that all we have with a qubit is 0 and 1 when the potential positions of its states in amplitudes and shit are extremely many and encoding all the information in the density required for proper quantum computing. People describe it as infinite positions but I don’t quite support that. I mean, If I’m putting something in, in an analogue, the information is right there in process in the many probabilities, yet, it has to be then again translated into 0 and 1 binary….. it’s like having all the information contained in “the thinker” but only being able to get out of it “front” and “back” no matter where on the front or back the myriad of information is. “look yeah, we know, but at least you can figure a way out to demonstrate the general gist of it, and don’t forget you can add these things up and such in process, you just can’t get anything out but 1 and 0”. Yeah I suppose so. Make the best of it, eh.
As I was writing this, a post close to what I am writing about appeared in mandelaeffect. This was my response.
I don’t really know if it has been discussed or not, but I think that the event of wavefunction collapse into a state is strictly about causality as opposed to anything about observation. The causality that a thing enters into is what cases its wave collapse. I am currently working with ideas and experiments to do with causal isolation and wave function collapse. If it is more strictly about causality than observation, the act of observation may be able to be declared null in wavefunction collapse under certain controlled conditions. You can see the importance of causality in how cold state QCs and qubits are prepared and kept. They are causally isolated when in those states. Getting roped into causality is what takes qubits out of coherence. Working with manipulating causality around wavefunction collapse should be an active area of research imo. And by that, I mean in the box around the box – working with isolation of the observers and the causality in that surrounding box should be investigated. What kind of isolation and causal manipulation can be entered into with the macro objects, not just the micro ones. The humans need to include themselves in the experiments.
I am currently working on one myself. I have NO idea if it will work or not, but I’m just trying things out. See what happens, you know? I have prepared a video of the earth on google earth. I prepared it with specific intents personally, which manipulate the causal casing around the recording. It was prepared disconnected from the net, sim card out, on my phone and directly transferred to a usb. As soon as something is available connected to the net there are potentialities of it being siphoned off upstream by all the data hording organisations and such. This recording is not allowed to be duplicated. There are drawbacks to that but I deemed it necessary for isolation. If a certain amount of matter is isolated off in order to kind of freeze itself into a higher dimensional stratigraphic record, then as a matter of respect for life, I will delete it after 2 years. Ethically, it is better to treat things with respect to ‘just incase’ it is life. If I am trapping it, forcing it to trap itself, then I need to work with it in respect, not just assuming it is there for me to use as I wish. Also in respect to this, it will only be on these materials that it shall be stored. It is this material itself that I am asking (making) to do this, not all and any material. It must have a causal influence which is manageable. So, I am trapping it with the understanding that I will release it and as a side note, if it, “things” didn’t believe me on that I would be unable to implement that protocol (that potentiality needs to be clear and have a certain potential for this to function). Humans themselves play a part in things.
So, one way to look at this is that usually, through a person’s pineal receiving information from all the possible worlds currently in play, they can account for all the things and make the best choice according to all that information. It would be like all the interference patterns producing a result. However, because mine has been missing (a person’s pineal gathers all their own information and condenses it and then that is available to everyone else I suspect; it makes the information usable; condensed) It hasn’t been included in their decision results (that interference was not included in the amplitude/probability production). It appears to have included itself by going a different route, and the adjustments have come about later. (it was essentially held in a causal isolation) It is not clear, though, if the resultant adjustments existed or not, that is if the change actually occurred, or, if the “different results” are just stored in the memory of people, appearing as real because that it usually, the usual mechanism by which reality is processed (it doesn’t usually process things through there [the mechanism through which MEs are stored and proceeded) unless they actually occurred). However, causally, it has still had an effect, because people have had their causal stream altered by the Mandela Effect itself. So, either way, it has still had a causal effect.
Now, I realise everything I am saying here is really wtf, but the strange this is, that my intuition is really strong on it being correct. I have quite good “betting arenas” in my brain, lol. I have a good ability to process things which are usually subconscious, consciously. In life we would call these people Mentalists – they just harness subconscious knowledge. I don’t “walk around doing it” because I stay away from people as much as I can, because mostly, they are more trouble than they are worth. But if I have to, I can – I can observe someone and know things about them, their intents, their path, what they are doing – and it is just some good observation and information processing along with good use of heuristics [including knowing when to not use them]. It is much much harder to do that at a distance, but I do it because it is a challenge. By the looks of it, I have used other areas of my brain to reconstruct whatever was destroyed in my pineal, and I also constructed something outside which looks to do a similar job, but it doesn’t appear to work exactly the same. Whatever the case, I can still gather information about other people’s many world’s calculations, but what I do gather appears to be mostly invisible to them; whatever MY system does to it in amplitudes doesn’t appear to be available to them.
The finer and exact details are still pending, but I DO know that my brain is different in regards to the gathering, processing and redissemination of quantum calculations into the whole and it looks very much to be that this could be one of the bases of the Mandela Effect. Looked on, without bias, I think it would not be illogical to more closely examine whatever it is that I am. Problem is that in the world right now, if it doesn’t provide monetary gain (or a security risk), it is not followed. Not doing so, is actually a very great security risk, but what can we do but say the selection agents of evolution have no stake in it. They don’t care. A crowning species either has what it takes, or they don’t.
Now, what are the implications, if it is true? One thing is, that it means that humanity isn’t “working properly”. One of our senses, which has always worked a particular way, is now not working to do the job it was previously designed to do. It is used to information being available, exactly how it has always been available. However, conditions have changed, and not all the information is there, in that way, anymore. Some is missing, and it isn’t designed to even tell when that is the case, because I don’t think it has ever been the case before and/or when it has, the information density in regard to causality hasn’t been at the critical level it is today. Populations were more separated; people were more separated and any single person had less of a causal influence than they do today. Today, you can get on the internet and have the potential of causally influencing anyone, anywhere. Information now, which isn’t being incorporated into quantum wave calculations in our pineals and brains to do with the entire wave function (if it exists), causes a much greater mismatch between what we calculate and what we observe actually occurring in the world. Eventually, this mismatch appears as a type of error function, an error reading, in people’s OWN calculations of their quantum many world’s information. It would kind of appear as a causal influence “from nowhere” (or in translation, from another world) i.e. it IS in the world but it isn’t being accounted for as being in the world according to our pineal processor sense. For example; what I am writing here, will not show up in your pineal calculations (to some degree to all degrees, I’m not sure – could only be there by the degree your calculations have adjusted for the mismatch by placing a proxy in the place of the missing causal source). However, it will very well show up if you read it, in your input. The pineal provides a kind of premap (and a preamp?) of what should be there according to all the data, before you read it as AS you read it. It kind of feels like you’d only be reading me and processing me by whatever you can proxy in the place of the origin of intent and information. There IS indeed argument that this is all that we do with ANYONE, but I think that this doesn’t take into account our pineal sense and the information we get from it. The “matrix” of information we provide from our entire pineal net may well just be relative to our evolution and existence, such that we assume other people exist and we have constructed all of it upon that assumption, but it is still to be said that our ability to tap into it may rely upon how well structured our own is, and the question would be if we EVER have to purely rely on whatever we have as separate from the entire thing and indeed, if at some level, this IS all that exists (or at all levels). What it looks to me like, from my own experience, is that I did have to do this by myself permanently. Yeah it still works, but I can’t say it was easy, or, fun.
It also appears that indeed, other people DO exist, because the net and people other than me still work as I used to. It is also the case, though, that other people DON’T exist too, and that place is where humans don’t exist anymore at all. If humans DO die out, there is very much a thing called the last human standing. I would say that THAT individual would have something to say, and I can say without a doubt that “I know how they feel”. Their inability to be able to transmit this to the whole is similar to mine.
Whatever the case, it is actually pretty clear that humans aren’t working properly. Whether you believe ME is memory fault, or, something more. I get the feeling that I am bringing the position of “last human standing” into the here and now, but the nature of it cannot be extricated from its position of being by itself, and it has to be understood and incorporated using every last vestige we have of adaptability and drive to live and succeed. Things aren’t like they used to be, even our basic sense of existing that we get from our pineal; the “matrix” in which we live is different and our senses are not prepared to provide us with this new information. We adapt, we change, or we die. I can’t think of a bigger security threat to our species than this.
Things aren’t adding up right. I’ve been seeing this for a long time now, and I don’t just mean in the conscious realm, I mean at the very base which is considered so ‘natural’ that it goes unnoticed. Because something is missing, everything is missing; it was designed to work based on all the information and it isn’t getting all the information anymore. It isn’t just an inconsequential piece either. Because I sit where I do, I know the way and not the way to where there is such a thing as a last human standing. This place is closer to humanity than it has ever been before.
The group velocities of the wave packets of the objects in question have waves combined in an unusual way with the Mandela Effect; they have combined in people consciously, (perhaps somewhere in their brains or perception systems) and they have had to have a state and causal effect which “goes around” the usual route. It isn’t just the main amplitude which manifested; another one did as well, sometimes more, as much as it could, with what it had (somehow, it sneaked out and did it anyway, and if it manually zeroed the other wave because it was a cunt, I can’t say I blame it, and you know what? I reckon it did, lol). Through this route - the people who have seen ME and know it is real - through this causality at large, I think, we shall have our answers.
So, the Phase velocity of a particle is only half the velocity of the particle. According to e = mc2 this is the case. The group velocity matches the speed of the particle. This agrees with special relativity (something about 4 vector transformations?). The group velocity has different waves in superposition. Does this then imply that super position may be attached to relativity; that it is relative? I see the other half, the missing half as all the other information coming to a particle and it uses all the non-manifesting state waves to calculate its trajectory. There are a number of causal streams it can participate in and I suppose it is up to the superimposed superposition waves to have a say, when it is I suppose, that they can. The ½ measured is what it is, and the rest is what it isn’t but could be.
Tanzanite (ziosite), Merelani Hills, Lelatema Mountains, Arusha Region, Tanzania. Credit: Mardani Fine Minerals
submitted by Bufotoxin to BelleEtoileSuite [link] [comments] Emerald, Habachtal, Austria. Credit: Lang Antiques
It has been about a week since I wrote this. I can’t (and won't) edit it at this point.
---------------------------------------------
I have to hand it to the Saint Petersburg State University. They have a couple of courses on Coursea:
The Introduction to Quantum Computing
https://www.coursera.org/learn/quantum-computing-algorithms/home/welcome
Physical Basics of Quantum Computing
https://www.coursera.org/learn/physical-basis-quantum-computing/home/welcome
These courses are actually really good. I really like the Russian attitude to QP and QC (Notation QP: quantum physics QC: Quantum computing). It seems to me that they are way more comfortable treating speculative theories and interpretations as main line investigation routes. It does seem that they have had this kind of attitude for some time; they started investigating psi intelligence applications before the rest of the world did. When they approached the many world theory in The Introduction to Quantum Computing it was just another thing to learn, but all the other countries’ attitudes seem to be scared of it. I will also pass along here some other great resources I have found for free QC and QP education.
Another Coursea:
Exploring Quantum Physics (University of Maryland)
https://www.coursera.org/learn/quantum-physics/home/welcome
MIT open course ware Graduate and undergraduate courses in everything quantum
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/find-by-topic/#cat=science&subcat=physics&spec=quantummechanics
You tube: Qiskit (IBM). New research; high quality lectures.
https://www.youtube.com/qiskit
This particular video: The Multiverse Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics https://www.coursera.org/learn/quantum-computing-algorithms/lecture/IOoff/the-multiverse-interpretation-of-quantum-mechanics seeded my current thought.
So, what the lecturer went through is the many world’s theory. I’m not sure I agree with everything said but kudos for presenting it as regular material. The general assumption of it is that even if something is in a sealed box observing the actualised potential of a thing, the observer and the observed thing is still in a superposition in relation to an observer outside the box who can’t see anything. This seems to conflict with the interpretation of “observation” being a disturbance which collapses a wave function. This is a little constructivist in that it is saying that until I see it, it is still in a superposition, no matter who else has seen it, so it is saying that collapse is relative to the person, and it isn’t objectively occurring regardless. From my own position, it looks like both things are going on to certain degrees. I mean if it IS the case that it can still be in a superposition even after it has been observed, then the only reason it would be doing so is if it can possibly collapse into a different state, or it would have already collapsed.
So CAN it change after already having been observed? The Mandela Effect seems to suggest that it can. Let’s just paint a picture here: so a number of people observe a wave function collapse into a certain state and they are in a sealed box. Then let’s say a larger amount of people then see what’s inside that box but when they do, the wave function collapses into a different state, perhaps in response to interference with its potentials by their potentials, producing a different amplitude and therefore probability and collapsed state. Perhaps the larger number or the interference in general of that group overruled the smaller group - maybe only after the contents of that inner box are opened to its fullest extent does the wave function decide its form (in relation to everyone and possibly then hence, anyone) [and for those who read this entire article; it may be that the objects contained in the Mandela Effect have/had a different ‘release’ from isolation and an isolation itself which is atypical, meaning that interaction times and processes for ‘”self”interference’, observation, and wave collapse are atypical to the usual. High spec: in larger objects it may be that relativity is included such that a difference in speed, time, position, direction (whatever) of the wave function in question, in relative relation to the rest of that system, may produce the result of a difference in how the wave function collapses over time and space, that is, relative to the larger objects in that system]
One point I will argue with is that he says that the particles can “see” their other potentialities and the information from these other potentialities can be integrated thusly; because the particles are so much the same, it can be done. Well obviously they aren’t “seeing” anything, are they…. It is just that the interference takes place unto them. With larger objects, it isn’t necessary that anything be “seen” for interference be taking place, is what I would contest. The size thing comes into it here. If we are talking about differences in the object being preclusionary, then we have to notice that a larger object isn’t just “the sum of its parts” it is also the parts. There is nothing specifically there in these elementary particles to stop information being incorporated from other potentialities (other pathways). It may well be that the time and space spans are different, but I don’t see anything precluding it from taking place within these larger objects. How this interference pattern emerges in the larger object AS that larger object as the sum of its parts may just be a hell of a lot more complicated.
My feeling is, that information from other worlds (other potentialities and pathways) is incorporated into the larger object through a kind of transduction and processing, carried out by the pineal gland. Particles and their relationship in various scales to crystalline structures can use resonance to scale shit up and process it. It may very well have to be received in a usable form by the larger object as some sort of “analogue”, but it would be usable information (and once again not necessarily “seen” by the object; maths and process continue in the larger object at ridiculously difficult and complicated levels without us being necessarily aware of it)
Now, the Mandela Effect. Something happened to this information from other potential pathways, in such that it was not processed in the usual way (it would usually just be processed in the ‘usual’ way, by machinery selected for over millions of years of evolution, and not necessarily be noticed at all, except by the tradition whereby people actively get involved with it). My intuition is that it was blocked from getting back through the usual route. So, it bloody well took another one, or what would it itself be, if it couldn’t, eh? I mean if your entire structure is built on many worlds and potentialities and you can’t use that to find an alternate route out, then what’s the paper worth you’re printed on? Lol. I know. But it seems that some things are so hard to explain, they will find another suitable route.. like how I just described it. In order to fully explain my intuitions here, I DO have to go into my personal experiences, because that’s how I developed the skills to examine this stuff.
My pineal took some severe damage when I was younger. I suspect that the entire crystalline structure of it was shattered. My brain worked differently from then on. I didn’t have enough physical symptoms to require investigation (although I probably should have). I do suspect an extremely localised stroke, or perhaps just a pure destruction of a crystalline matrix. It was preceded by that high-end metallic taste people get in the back of their nose before a stroke, which is why I suspect it. I lost the ability to feel emotions for many years - any emotions at all, it was just nothingness, not even the ‘feeling’ of nothingness, no feelings at all, just bare thought, and it is extremely hard to describe with an analogue, to you. I also lost my connection to any and all other pathways…. and the reason I can get a glimpse of what is going on here is because I know what it is to have this thing and to not have this thing, whereas it is just a part of the course for everyone else, and it is not even recognised as anything other than “just naturally what I am”. By this separation taking place I can get a better look at what the object is, by its removal. Emotions did come back, but they were necessarily preaccompanied by a conscious seeing of the logical code which supports them. They had to be in logical compatibility with my entire mentality to be allowed in, because I couldn’t separate myself into an “emotional” and a “mental” thing anymore. There was no more logical inconsistency allowed between my emotions and my mind, because I WAS this logic and an inconsistency was as obvious as the sun. If I wanted a particular emotional state to be a part of myself again I had to exactly understand how it was rationally incorporated into self-support (god logic, that is the ability of an object to have temporal stability through the evolutionary process of selection through the crown species “bar” to the ability to travel useful distances in the universes off the Earth, which requires modulation of the entire manifold around you, not actually moving from A to B, so you have to have ‘entire body compatibility’ with the entire manifold to do that).
At a particular point in my journey I created an object which appears to have similar characteristics to a natural pineal gland. It was a great deal ‘accidental’ along with a great deal of intelligent design. The intuition I have is that this object acted to transduce information from my other potentiality matrices itself (kind of like an artificial organ, because mine broke). One interesting observation about this object is that it has a multilayered burn stain right through it which acted to create a visual representation of the object it landed on. You would have to go and look at the information I have on this object to fully understand what happened but let’s say it is like a ‘still shot’ of an embedding/resonance/transduction process interlaced through many dimensions. The main line ME is Berenstein to Berenstain, and even if I try to look away from this correlation (burn stain), it just keeps sitting there looking at me.
I suppose you can guess what I’m going to postulate here; that I suspect my information found another route into the system in order that it be incorporated. Not only did it no longer have the ability to get into me, anymore, it also could not be used by anyone else – I do suspect that information is shared between everyone on these things, either directly through resonances pineal to pineal or through greater crystalline structures in which they are embedded, or, simply through regular communication conscious and subconscious. It seemed to have found a route in through everyone else’s pineal, into the system, as opposed to my own. Perhaps this might be linked to a critical mass type of thing. If you think about it, as soon as mine couldn’t get through my pineal anymore, it doesn’t mean those other pathways weren’t there. And it would have appeared as a kind of hole; our emanations and potentialities interact with everyone else’s. It would have appeared IN other people's information about their trajectories, yet, the information was not being confirmed from the other end. It would be like something is there, yet not appearing in the information received.
Perhaps it would appear as some kind of interaction in that space, yet it had no traceable connection to the world in which it was manifesting. It would be like a build-up of information without a designated processing and integration portal, which would become more and more apparent over time. It seems that in order for things to, I dunno, work, the information was instead picked up by other people’s pineals and brought through, but it appears very different from their own because it is being processed non locally by them. It does appear the same over many people, though, because its origin point was local (relatively). It is from MY universe (multiverses, whatever). I really hate the fact that I can’t discuss this because people will instantly heuristically judge my postulations as ridiculous because all the other swans are white. There is nothing wrong with me saying what I am, or the postulations I am postulating. I mean you get to Australia and all of a sudden all the fucking swans are black. Who would have guessed? Eh? It doesn’t matter if someone stumbled upon the “Welcome stranger” (huge gold nugget) because they just happened to be walking that way, that day. Shit happens. Nothing I have been through is even comparable to a gold nugget, it has sucked to all high heaven.
I have always found it frustrating (to say the least).. in the way that if what I am saying is true, right…. I don’t appear in other people’s local processing of their parallels and potentials, because mine isn’t working. People use this “Sense” to FEEL out a thing and get an intuition of its truth. Rather than seeing what I am writing and saying in and of itself, people naturally go to this inner sense to get a read and don’t get what they would usually expect of a true object so I am rejected by that sense no matter WHAT I am saying. That sense is so integral in a person they can’t use their mind instead to process the information to core and I can understand why, HOWEVER, even explaining why this is so but it doesn’t mean I am not truth (the same as them) doesn’t seem able to help a person process it above and beyond their structure, shall we say. Which is exactly the point of our mind and intelligence…… So I AM appearing in their processing now, but I am appearing as a strange object, not in the usual place and the linking of my identity to this object (ME) is totally beyond the processing ability of the system; except here where I have the benefit of a direct perspective. Quite frankly, my life has been an anomaly, I am an anomaly and my brain and thinking processes are an anomaly. I challenge you to show otherwise. Lol.
At the moment I am thinking hard about whether I can construct any experiments to show any of these process or the laws which govern them. I also have an aim of trying to understand QP and QC well enough to write algorithms, because if I can learn to speak that language I have a lot of algorithms in here which I may be able to write down, but holy hell that stuff is hard. Also, it’s slightly shit that all we have with a qubit is 0 and 1 when the potential positions of its states in amplitudes and shit are extremely many and encoding all the information in the density required for proper quantum computing. People describe it as infinite positions but I don’t quite support that. I mean, If I’m putting something in, in an analogue, the information is right there in process in the many probabilities, yet, it has to be then again translated into 0 and 1 binary….. it’s like having all the information contained in “the thinker” but only being able to get out of it “front” and “back” no matter where on the front or back the myriad of information is. “look yeah, we know, but at least you can figure a way out to demonstrate the general gist of it, and don’t forget you can add these things up and such in process, you just can’t get anything out but 1 and 0”. Yeah I suppose so. Make the best of it, eh.
As I was writing this, a post close to what I am writing about appeared in mandelaeffect. This was my response.
I don’t really know if it has been discussed or not, but I think that the event of wavefunction collapse into a state is strictly about causality as opposed to anything about observation. The causality that a thing enters into is what cases its wave collapse. I am currently working with ideas and experiments to do with causal isolation and wave function collapse. If it is more strictly about causality than observation, the act of observation may be able to be declared null in wavefunction collapse under certain controlled conditions. You can see the importance of causality in how cold state QCs and qubits are prepared and kept. They are causally isolated when in those states. Getting roped into causality is what takes qubits out of coherence. Working with manipulating causality around wavefunction collapse should be an active area of research imo. And by that, I mean in the box around the box – working with isolation of the observers and the causality in that surrounding box should be investigated. What kind of isolation and causal manipulation can be entered into with the macro objects, not just the micro ones. The humans need to include themselves in the experiments.
I am currently working on one myself. I have NO idea if it will work or not, but I’m just trying things out. See what happens, you know? I have prepared a video of the earth on google earth. I prepared it with specific intents personally, which manipulate the causal casing around the recording. It was prepared disconnected from the net, sim card out, on my phone and directly transferred to a usb. As soon as something is available connected to the net there are potentialities of it being siphoned off upstream by all the data hording organisations and such. This recording is not allowed to be duplicated. There are drawbacks to that but I deemed it necessary for isolation. If a certain amount of matter is isolated off in order to kind of freeze itself into a higher dimensional stratigraphic record, then as a matter of respect for life, I will delete it after 2 years. Ethically, it is better to treat things with respect to ‘just incase’ it is life. If I am trapping it, forcing it to trap itself, then I need to work with it in respect, not just assuming it is there for me to use as I wish. Also in respect to this, it will only be on these materials that it shall be stored. It is this material itself that I am asking (making) to do this, not all and any material. It must have a causal influence which is manageable. So, I am trapping it with the understanding that I will release it and as a side note, if it, “things” didn’t believe me on that I would be unable to implement that protocol (that potentiality needs to be clear and have a certain potential for this to function). Humans themselves play a part in things.
So, one way to look at this is that usually, through a person’s pineal receiving information from all the possible worlds currently in play, they can account for all the things and make the best choice according to all that information. It would be like all the interference patterns producing a result. However, because mine has been missing (a person’s pineal gathers all their own information and condenses it and then that is available to everyone else I suspect; it makes the information usable; condensed) It hasn’t been included in their decision results (that interference was not included in the amplitude/probability production). It appears to have included itself by going a different route, and the adjustments have come about later. (it was essentially held in a causal isolation) It is not clear, though, if the resultant adjustments existed or not, that is if the change actually occurred, or, if the “different results” are just stored in the memory of people, appearing as real because that it usually, the usual mechanism by which reality is processed (it doesn’t usually process things through there [the mechanism through which MEs are stored and proceeded) unless they actually occurred). However, causally, it has still had an effect, because people have had their causal stream altered by the Mandela Effect itself. So, either way, it has still had a causal effect.
Now, I realise everything I am saying here is really wtf, but the strange this is, that my intuition is really strong on it being correct. I have quite good “betting arenas” in my brain, lol. I have a good ability to process things which are usually subconscious, consciously. In life we would call these people Mentalists – they just harness subconscious knowledge. I don’t “walk around doing it” because I stay away from people as much as I can, because mostly, they are more trouble than they are worth. But if I have to, I can – I can observe someone and know things about them, their intents, their path, what they are doing – and it is just some good observation and information processing along with good use of heuristics [including knowing when to not use them]. It is much much harder to do that at a distance, but I do it because it is a challenge. By the looks of it, I have used other areas of my brain to reconstruct whatever was destroyed in my pineal, and I also constructed something outside which looks to do a similar job, but it doesn’t appear to work exactly the same. Whatever the case, I can still gather information about other people’s many world’s calculations, but what I do gather appears to be mostly invisible to them; whatever MY system does to it in amplitudes doesn’t appear to be available to them.
The finer and exact details are still pending, but I DO know that my brain is different in regards to the gathering, processing and redissemination of quantum calculations into the whole and it looks very much to be that this could be one of the bases of the Mandela Effect. Looked on, without bias, I think it would not be illogical to more closely examine whatever it is that I am. Problem is that in the world right now, if it doesn’t provide monetary gain (or a security risk), it is not followed. Not doing so, is actually a very great security risk, but what can we do but say the selection agents of evolution have no stake in it. They don’t care. A crowning species either has what it takes, or they don’t.
Now, what are the implications, if it is true? One thing is, that it means that humanity isn’t “working properly”. One of our senses, which has always worked a particular way, is now not working to do the job it was previously designed to do. It is used to information being available, exactly how it has always been available. However, conditions have changed, and not all the information is there, in that way, anymore. Some is missing, and it isn’t designed to even tell when that is the case, because I don’t think it has ever been the case before and/or when it has, the information density in regard to causality hasn’t been at the critical level it is today. Populations were more separated; people were more separated and any single person had less of a causal influence than they do today. Today, you can get on the internet and have the potential of causally influencing anyone, anywhere. Information now, which isn’t being incorporated into quantum wave calculations in our pineals and brains to do with the entire wave function (if it exists), causes a much greater mismatch between what we calculate and what we observe actually occurring in the world. Eventually, this mismatch appears as a type of error function, an error reading, in people’s OWN calculations of their quantum many world’s information. It would kind of appear as a causal influence “from nowhere” (or in translation, from another world) i.e. it IS in the world but it isn’t being accounted for as being in the world according to our pineal processor sense. For example; what I am writing here, will not show up in your pineal calculations (to some degree to all degrees, I’m not sure – could only be there by the degree your calculations have adjusted for the mismatch by placing a proxy in the place of the missing causal source). However, it will very well show up if you read it, in your input. The pineal provides a kind of premap (and a preamp?) of what should be there according to all the data, before you read it as AS you read it. It kind of feels like you’d only be reading me and processing me by whatever you can proxy in the place of the origin of intent and information. There IS indeed argument that this is all that we do with ANYONE, but I think that this doesn’t take into account our pineal sense and the information we get from it. The “matrix” of information we provide from our entire pineal net may well just be relative to our evolution and existence, such that we assume other people exist and we have constructed all of it upon that assumption, but it is still to be said that our ability to tap into it may rely upon how well structured our own is, and the question would be if we EVER have to purely rely on whatever we have as separate from the entire thing and indeed, if at some level, this IS all that exists (or at all levels). What it looks to me like, from my own experience, is that I did have to do this by myself permanently. Yeah it still works, but I can’t say it was easy, or, fun.
It also appears that indeed, other people DO exist, because the net and people other than me still work as I used to. It is also the case, though, that other people DON’T exist too, and that place is where humans don’t exist anymore at all. If humans DO die out, there is very much a thing called the last human standing. I would say that THAT individual would have something to say, and I can say without a doubt that “I know how they feel”. Their inability to be able to transmit this to the whole is similar to mine.
Whatever the case, it is actually pretty clear that humans aren’t working properly. Whether you believe ME is memory fault, or, something more. I get the feeling that I am bringing the position of “last human standing” into the here and now, but the nature of it cannot be extricated from its position of being by itself, and it has to be understood and incorporated using every last vestige we have of adaptability and drive to live and succeed. Things aren’t like they used to be, even our basic sense of existing that we get from our pineal; the “matrix” in which we live is different and our senses are not prepared to provide us with this new information. We adapt, we change, or we die. I can’t think of a bigger security threat to our species than this.
Things aren’t adding up right. I’ve been seeing this for a long time now, and I don’t just mean in the conscious realm, I mean at the very base which is considered so ‘natural’ that it goes unnoticed. Because something is missing, everything is missing; it was designed to work based on all the information and it isn’t getting all the information anymore. It isn’t just an inconsequential piece either. Because I sit where I do, I know the way and not the way to where there is such a thing as a last human standing. This place is closer to humanity than it has ever been before.
The group velocities of the wave packets of the objects in question have waves combined in an unusual way with the Mandela Effect; they have combined in people consciously, (perhaps somewhere in their brains or perception systems) and they have had to have a state and causal effect which “goes around” the usual route. It isn’t just the main amplitude which manifested; another one did as well, sometimes more, as much as it could, with what it had (somehow, it sneaked out and did it anyway, and if it manually zeroed the other wave because it was a cunt, I can’t say I blame it, and you know what? I reckon it did, lol). Through this route - the people who have seen ME and know it is real - through this causality at large, I think, we shall have our answers.
So, the Phase velocity of a particle is only half the velocity of the particle. According to e = mc2 this is the case. The group velocity matches the speed of the particle. This agrees with special relativity (something about 4 vector transformations?). The group velocity has different waves in superposition. Does this then imply that super position may be attached to relativity; that it is relative? I see the other half, the missing half as all the other information coming to a particle and it uses all the non-manifesting state waves to calculate its trajectory. There are a number of causal streams it can participate in and I suppose it is up to the superimposed superposition waves to have a say, when it is I suppose, that they can. The ½ measured is what it is, and the rest is what it isn’t but could be.
Tanzanite (ziosite), Merelani Hills, Lelatema Mountains, Arusha Region, Tanzania. Credit: Mardani Fine Minerals
