For the last part in this series, I wanted to do two things that might actually help people win their bracket by answering two questions: is their a correlation between a protected (1-4) seeds profile and their chances of going deep into the tournament and how have similar teams in terms of raw efficiency performed in the past?
The second part is literally just data collection. I have to shout out the wonderful
barttorvik.com for the last time since that is where this tool originates and I merely put it together.
PART 1 - TOP 4 SEEDS BASED ON ADJO AND ADJD Duke is good. We know this. But, how good? Well, they rank in the Top 10 in both AdjO and AdjD. But, wait, there's more! UNC, Virginia, and Gonzaga do as well. That seems like it's good. *checks with judges* Yep, it's good. Does it mean anything come tournament time and what about the teams that aren't our murderous quartet of #1 seeds?
What Is This? Basic groupings of ten because I'm a human and we run off base ten. This means, it's looking at teams with similar profiles (i.e. ranked 11th-20th in AdjO and 21st-30th in AdjD) and how those teams performed.
TOP 10 ADJO + TOP 10 ADJD The Teams: Virginia, Duke, UNC, Gonzaga There have been 11 #1 seeds in the past ten years to rank in the Top 10 on both sides of the ball heading into the tournament. Here's how they fared (a star means they lost the championship game)
Won Title: 2 (2010 Duke / 2012 Kentucky)
Made Final 4: 2 (2017 Gonzaga* / 2015 Kentucky)
Lost Elite 8: 4 (2016 Kansas / 2016 Virginia / 2012 UNC / 2011 Kansas)
Lost Sweet 16: 2 (2011 Duke / 2011 Ohio State)
Lost 2nd Round: 1 (2010 Kansas)
What It Means: I'm hesitant to do this, but this is easily the strongest group of #1 seeds in the past ten years. Only 1 out of the 11 previous teams didn't make the Sweet 16, losing in one of the most memorable upsets of the decade. But, it's not a guarantee of sustained success. Half of these teams didn't even make the Final 4. One of these teams is probably losing in the Sweet 16, but which one? Your guess is as good as mine.
TOP 10 ADJO + 11-20 ADJD The Teams: Michigan State There have been 12 teams total, but only 4 #2 seeds who fit in this group.
Made Final 4: 1 (2015 (#1) Wisconsin*)
Lost Elite 8: 3 (2012 (#1) Syracuse, 2018 (#2) Duke, 2015 (#2) Arizona)
Lost Sweet 16: 5 (2013 (#1) Indiana, 2010 (#1) Syracuse, 2018 (#2) Purdue, 2009 (#2) Duke, 2015 (#4) UNC)
Lost 2nd Round: 3 (2017 (#1) Villanova, 2015 (#1) Villanova, 2013 (#1) Gonzaga
What It Means: I'm picking against them, but the Spartans seem like a good bet to at least make the Sweet 16 based on recent history. The three teams to lose before then were all #1s with a double Villanova in there. But, no team in this group has ever won the title.
TOP 10 ADJO + 31-40 ADJD The Teams: Tennessee, Purdue A little smaller grouping here as only six teams qualify in this group, but it's an interesting bunch...
Won Title: 2 (2015 (#1) Duke, 2009 (#1) UNC)
Made Final 4: 1 (2018 (#1) Kansas)
Lost 2nd Round: 3 (2017 (#2) Duke, 2014 (#2) Kansas, 2016 (#4) Kentucky)
What It Means: I am out on Tennessee. They might prove me wrong given Grant Williams and Schofield's pedigree and talent, but there's a lot working against them. Purdue is a more interesting case as you'll see later. It seems like they're screwed. Their raw #s have an amazing precedent (seriously, if you scroll down to look at one team, look at Purdue).
TOP 10 ADJO + 40+ ADJD The Teams: LSU There are a whopping 23 teams that fit in this category so I won't break them all down. About half of the 23 didn't survive to the Sweet 16. The only two teams to make the Final 4 in this group was the 2013 Michigan team and 2014 Wisconsin team who IIRC fielded some of the top offenses in KenPom history. LSU is 9th on Torvik. There are some positive teams on the 3 seed line, though. 2010 Baylor and 2015 Notre Dame both made the Elite 8 coming from this grouping. So, it's not out of the realm of possibility.
TOP 10 ADJD + 11-20 ADJO The Teams: Michigan Only 7 teams in this grouping. Four were #1 or #2 seeds.
2014 (#1) Florida - Final 4
2012 (#1) Michigan State - Sweet 16
2009 (#1) UConn - Final 4
2012 (#2) Kansas - Championship Game
What It Means: Not sure, but it seems like teams that can lock down on D and are relatively efficient on offense are capable of making deep runs, just not winning the whole thing. That sounds like Michigan to me! Wait, this isn't
cfb. No, stop, don't attack me. I'm sorry.
11-20 ADJO + 11-20 ADJD The Teams: Kentucky, Houston A solid 10 teams in this grouping that are very hit-or-miss. More than half (6) made the Elite 8, but only 2 made the Final 4 (the Buddy Hield Oklahoma team and the 2013 Syracuse team). Three teams didn't make it out of the 2nd Round including last year's Michigan State fiasco and the 2015 Kansas team that lost to an admittedly good Wichita State team that was underseeded.
What It Means: Well, one of these teams isn't going to the Elite 8 because they're in the same side of the region. The question becomes do you like Wofford/Seton Hall over Kentucky or Iowa State/Ohio State over Houston more?
11-20 ADJO + 21-30 ADJ The Teams: Virginia Tech Only 4 teams fit this profile so sample size and all that. None made it past the Sweet 16. If you extend it out to any team with a defense outside of the Top 20 without a Top 10 offense, you get sixteen teams total. Only two made it to the Elite 8.
21-30 ADJO + TOP 10 ADJD The Teams: Texas Tech Another large grouping featuring 13 previous teams that fit this profile. Only two have made the Final 4: The 2013 Louisville team that was the #1 Overall Seed and the 2009 Michigan State team who was 2 seed. Five teams didn't make it out of the first two rounds. Two of them were Virginia teams including last year's not-so-good bois and the West Virginia team that got upset in a 3/14 game.
What It Means: It means I'm tired and we're all probably screwed and you should just look at team colors or something. Or continue to the second part because it might be more enlightening.
31-40 ADJO + 11+ ADJD The Teams: Florida State, Kansas You're a team who's fine on offense. You don't have an elite D, though. That's a shame. Be nice to have. Hey, there's eight teams like us in the past ten years. I'm sure some of them made a Final 4 or something. No? Huh. An Elite 8? Yep! Okay, no. But, two of them did make the Sweet 16. One less than got knocked out in the 1st Round. Oh, that's bad. It sure is!
40+ ADJO + TOP 10 ADJD The Teams: Kansas State I lied. I said on Monday that K-State sucked and GIFs were for dummies and there's only one Manhattan and it sure isn't in the middle of nowhere. I was only looking at teams that had sub-40th ranked offenses. That doesn't look so good. But, if you have a really elite D? It gets better!
75% of these teams made the Sweet 16. 9 out of 12. Almost half of them made the Elite 8. It's not as dire as it seems for Kansas State. Of course, one of these teams was last year's Cincy team. And the Georgetown team that got stomped by FGCU.
PART 2 - TORVIK'S SIMILAR TEAMS AND AVERAGE WINS Explanation: I can't really take credit for this. Torvik has an amazing feature where you can look at any team from this year, click on 'Similar Profiles' and then check boxes limiting the comparison to 'Tournament Teams Only' and 'Similar Seeds'. This measures raw efficiency and tempo (so not ranking relative to other teams like all my other research) giving you the 10 most similar teams within 1 seed line, i.e., if you are a #5 seed it will show you both 4 and 6 seeds. It displays how far each of those 10 teams advanced plus a total 'Average Wins'. That's the number displayed here. So, I did that for all 66 remaining teams in the tournament. The results are below along with notes on some of the teams. There are certainly some interesting things in here...
EAST #1 Duke: 2.8 - Only two of the ten most-similar teams made the Final 4.
#16 NDSU/NC Central: 0
#8 VCU: 0.7 - 3-4 in the 8 vs. 9 game - and the 2017 South Carolina team boosted the average - no other team made the Sweet 16)
#9 UCF: 0-3 (3-3 in the 8 vs. 9 game)
#5 Mississippi State: 2.1 - tied for 2nd highest in the region, only three of the ten most similar teams didn't make the Sweet 16
#12 Liberty: 0.2 - 2-8 among ten most similar teams
#4 Virginia Tech: 1.9 - four teams went to the Elite 8, the others all failed to make it out the 2nd Round
#13 St. Louis: 0.2
#6 Maryland: 1.2 - their top 3 comparisons all made the Sweet 16, nobody else made it out of the 2nd Round including all of the #6 seeds
#11 Belmont: 0.3 - all the 11 seeds lost their first game
#3 LSU: 1.4 - this is way closer to a 5 or 6 seed than a 3 seed
#14 Yale: 0
#7 Louisville: 2.1 - tied for 2nd highest in the region, best for any seed lower than 6
#10 Minnesota: 0.5 - mostly 1st Round losses
#2 Michigan State: 2.1 - lowest among all #2 seeds, none of their Top 10 comparisons made the Final 4
#15 Bradley: 0
WEST #1 Gonzaga: 2.8 - same average as Duke, but four of the ten teams didn't make it to the Elite 8
#16 FDU: 0
#8 Syracuse: 1.2 - either out in the first or to the Sweet 16
#9 Baylor: 0.7 - the 2011 Butler team heavily brings up this average, it's a lot of losses in 7 vs. 10 and 8 vs. 9 games
#5 Marquette: 1.3 - no Elite 8 appearances, majority won 1st Round game
#12 Murray State: 0.7 - half won their 1st Round game
#4 Florida State: 1.6 - all the other 4 seeds in their top 10 comparisons made the Elite 8
#13 Vermont: 0
#6 Buffalo: 0.5 - teams are 4-6, none of their Top 10 made the Sweet 16
#11 Arizona St.: 0.9 - their three best comparisons all made the Sweet 16 / #11 St. John's: 0.7
#7 Nevada: 0.8 - only 1 made the Sweet 16, majority won their 1st round game
#10 Florida: 1 - their two closest comparisons both made the Elite 8, nearly every other lost their 1st round game
#2 Michigan: 2.6 - five went to the Elite 8, three went to the Final 4
#15 Montana: 0.2 (MTSU over MSU and Mercer over Duke were in their Top 10)
SOUTH #1 Virginia: 2.7 - hard to decipher because their top comparisons are all Virginia teams
#16 Gardner-Webb: 0
#8 Ole Miss: 0.7 - no Sweet 16 teams
#9 Oklahoma: 0.5
#5 Wisconsin: 1.2 - lowest among 5 seeds, top comparisons didn't make Sweet 16
#12 Oregon: 0.3 - top 6 comparisons all lost their first game
#4 Kansas State: 1.7 - top 3 comparisons all lost their first game, all the 4 seeds won a game
#13 UC-Irvine: 0.1
#6 Villanova: 1.3 - most 6 seeds won this game, but failed to advance past that
#11 St. Mary's: 0.2 - this was a little shocking to me
#3 Purdue: 3.1!!!!!! - this is the 2nd highest average for any team in the tournament, 9 of their top 10 comparisons made at least the Elite 8, CHOOOOOOO CHOOOOOO #14 Old Dominion: 0
#7 Cincinnati: 0.8 - only two teams advanced to the Sweet 16
#10 Iowa: 0.5
#2 Tennessee: 2.4
#15 Colgate: 0.2 (two upsets in here)
MIDWEST #1 UNC: 3.2 - highest among all teams, top comparisons all UNC teams that went 4
#16 Iona: 0
#8 Utah St.: 0.9
#9 Washington: 0.8 - both Utah State and Washington have a few sleepers in there
#5 Auburn: 1.2 - none of their comparisons made the Sweet 16
#12 New Mexico St.: 0.5 - similar teams are 3-7
#4 Kansas: 1 - YIKES!
#13 Northeastern: 0.2 - two wins, but both were #12 seeds
#6 Iowa State: 1.4
#11 Ohio State: 0 - yep, that's right, 0-10
#3 Houston: 2.2
#14 Georgia State: 0.4
#7 Wofford: 1.4 - three out of their top five closest comparisons made the Sweet 16 our further
#10 Seton Hall: 0.7
#2 Kentucky: 2.3 - four of their ten comparisons made the Elite 8
#15 Abilene Christian: 0.2
AND THAT'S IT FOR THIS YEAR!
I hope everyone enjoyed. Sorry about the lateness on this. Real life got in the way. I'm going to make my picks later tonight. Hopefully, this pans out otherwise I'll be exposed as a horrible fraud.
Thanks again for reading or browsing and all the gold/silver.
Lastly and most importantly, enjoy the games. It's the most wonderful time of the year!
submitted by Hello
/cfb, one of my biggest hobbies is betting on college football. I create a model every year to assist in my bets, and just finished my 2015 model. Instead of keeping the model to myself I like to share the sheets I create for every team. I have sheets for all 128 teams, but instead of posting all 128 at once I thought I would do it conference by conference.
It's too complicated to explain how it works in detail, but if you have questions I will answer! This model uses my advanced stats, then uses the same data from the past 5 seasons to help project how a team will do. It also creates a fingerprint of a team and shows which teams had similar preseason profiles to show which past teams match up closest with each team. It also predicts every single game for each team. This model is not the gospel, it's simply a starting point that uses math unbiasedly to try and output a projection. There will be teams that outperform and underperform the model. Don't think I have it out for your team if my model doesn't treat your team fairly - I simply plug in the numbers. No human input!
Link to the album of all 14 ACC Sheets: http://imgur.com/a/b0BhG My model's national rankings of the ACC: Projected ACC Standings Atlantic Division Clemson 10-3 (7-1)
Florida State 9-3 (6-2)
North Carolina State 8-4 (4-4)
Louisville 6-6 (4-4)
Boston College 6-6 (4-4)
Wake Forest 4-8 (1-7)
Syracuse 1-11 (0-8)
Coastal Division Georgia Tech 13-0 (8-0)
Duke 9-3 (5-3)
Pittsburgh 9-3 (5-3)
Virginia Tech 7-5 (4-4)
North Carolina 7-5 (4-4)
Miami 4-8 (2-6)
Virginia 4-8 (2-6)
Championship Game Georgia Tech 35,
Clemson 21
Observations -My model's credibility is immediately going to be put on the line with Georgia Tech, which has the Yellow Jackets going 13-0 and into the playoff. Why does my model like them? It thinks Georgia Tech will have the nation's most efficient offense with a Top 15 field position margin. That's big, but the defense at #64 makes me think that a 13-0 record, or even a 1 loss record, isn't going to happen. Sorry model, but I disagree with you here. Defense wins championships, and they will need it on nights the opponent has the triple option solved. However, I do think Georgia Tech will make the ACC Championship Game and is the favorite to win the ACC, but not with 0 or 1 loss. Georgia Tech's offensive fingerprints are 2014 TCU and 2014 Ohio State, which is good company. But defensive? A bunch of no names. And the overall finger prints are teams that had good offenses and bad defenses.
-The model also projects the nation's most efficient defense to reside in the ACC, with Virginia Tech. Unfortunately, the model also says Virginia Tech will have an offense in the 100s, at #104. And its not a fan of the Hokies against Ohio State, projecting a 36-12 loss. Even if you factor in Joey Bosa, the Buckeyes look to cover that 10 point spread.
-Notre Dame isn't an ACC team persay, but they show up in the schedules of these teams and my model is not a fan of them. At all.
-If those standings hold, Mike London and Al Golden will be looking for jobs after the end of the season, and Larry Fedora should hang on.
-Despite projecting a 6-6 record, Boston College will not be bowling due to two games vs. FCS teams.
-If you are looking for a dark horse, it has to be Pitt. My model has Pitt going 9-3, with 2 of those 3 losses being by 6 points or less. Pitt has the preseason #13 offense, and if Pat Narduzzi can fix that defense(at #106), this is a team to watch out for.
-Florida State at #18 may seem low for them, but my model hated them last year. They were #15 while the other 3 playoff teams are 1, 2, 3. I thought the committee was supposed to pick the 4 best teams and not the 4 most deserving?
-When it comes to the league's big non conference games, only Georgia Tech over Georgia is a winner for the ACC, and only a 3 point win at that.
submitted by 2015 NCAA tourney betting guide. By. ... Belmont is probably most known for nearly beating No. 2 Duke in 2008, but this year's team was 25th in the nation from the floor at 47.6 percent, and won ... Duke at North Carolina: Odds, betting lines and picks. Odds via BetMGM; access USA TODAY Sports’ betting odds for a full list. Lines last updated at 11:15 a.m. ET. Prediction. UNC 73, Duke 70. Moneyline (ML). This is a fringe play, but let’s SPRINKLE A SMALL WAGER ON NORTH CAROLINA +280 on the money line. From a recruiting standpoint, Duke does have a talent advantage: The Blue Devils have ... The Duke vs. Louisville betting line had the Cardinals as a -3.5 favorite seeing around 65 percent of the public wagering action on the spread.You can find all the latest odds at Bookmaker here Final Four 2015 Betting Odds: Updated Point Spread, Over/Under For Kentucky vs. Wisconsin, Duke vs. MSU By Anthony Riccobono @tony_riccobono 04/03/15 AT 10:55 AM Year Matchup Line Score SU Winner ATS Winner; 2019: Virginia (1) vs. Texas Tech (3) Virginia -2: 85-77: Virginia: Virginia -2: 2018: Villanova (1) vs. Michigan (3)
Syracuse orange vs Louisville Cardinals free college basketball betting prediction today. If your current ncaab picks have you down checkout ez-winners https... Louisville vs North Carolina starting lineups! ... UNC-Duke 2016 Starting Lineups - Duration: ... 2015-16 Louisville Basketball Intro - Duration: ... North Carolina vs Duke 2/8/20 Free College Basketball Pick and Prediction CBB Betting Tips The Duke Blue Devils visit the North Carolina Tar Heels in Saturday college basketball action. Kentucky vs Louisville 12/28/19 Free College Basketball Pick and Prediction CBB Betting Tips The Louisville Cardinals visit the Kentucky Wildcats in Saturday college basketball action. Duke Blue Devils vs North Carolina Tar Heels College Basketball predictions, picks, and odds, for Saturday, February 8, 2020: Our panel of expert sports handicappers share their college basketball ...