Top 10 Best UK Spread Betting Forex Brokers 2020 [UK ...

{GAME THREAD} PLAYOFFS ROUND 2 - GAME 1 - Boston Celtics (0-0) @ TORONTO RAPTORS (0-0) - 1:00pm (EST)

🚨REMINDER🚨: WHAT GETS ME BANNED FROM /torontoraptors?
GAME INFO:
Game Number: 2020 PLAYOFFS ROUND 2 - GAME 1
Date: Sunday August 30th, 2020
Current Streak: W8
Tip Off: 1:00 pm (EST)
Venue: HP Field House (Orlando, Florida)
Weather: 27°C (81°F) - Mainly Sunny
EASTERN CONF. PLAYOFF PICTURE:
ROUND 2 W ECF
(1) MILWAUKEE 0 XXXXX
(4) MIAMI 0 WINNER ROUND. 2
(3) BOSTON 0 WINNER ROUND. 2
(2) TORONTO 0 XXXXX
MEDIA:
Game Notes: TORONTO RAPTORS
Canadian TV: TSN 1, 4, 5 @ 1:00pm (EST)
^ Pre-Game on TSN 1, 4, 5 @ 12:30pm (EST)
US National TV: ESPN
Legal Streams:
Radio:
UNIFORMS:
BOXSCORES:
BETTING INFO:
Spread: Raptors -2.0 (-110)
Total: 217 (-110)
Money Line: Raptors -130
EXPECTED STARTING LINE UPS:
POSITION RAPTORS OPPONENT
PG Kyle Lowry Kemba Walker
SG Fred VanVleet Marcus Smart
SF OG Anunoby Jaylen Brown
PF Pascal Siakam Jayson Tatum
C Marc Gasol Daniel Theis
INJURY REPORT:
(as of 11:00am report)
RAPTORS STATUS INJURY
Oshae Brissett OUT Left Knee; Surgery
Kyle Lowry AVAILABLE Left Ankle; Sprain
Patrick McCaw OUT Left Knee; Surgery
OPPONENT STATUS INJURY
Javonte Green OUT Right Knee; Surgery
Gordon Hayward OUT Right Ankle; Sprain
Tremont Waters OUT Left Knee; Sprain
NBA REFEREE ASSIGNMENTS:
POSITION NUMBER NAME
Crew Chief #30 John Goble
Referee #14 Ed Malloy
Umpire #60 James Williams
Alternate #50 Gediminas Petraitis
wear a mask.
wash your hands.
install the Gov't of Canada COVID tracing app.
US Citizens living in Canada. VOTE!

stay safe Raptors fam.❤️

submitted by absolutkaos to torontoraptors [link] [comments]

Lost in the Sauce: DHS hides intelligence that reveals Trump using Russia's playbook, again

Welcome to Lost in the Sauce, keeping you caught up on political and legal news that often gets buried in distractions and theater… or a global health crisis.
Housekeeping:

Trump’s playbook is Russia’s playbook

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in July withheld an intelligence bulletin warning of a Russian plot to spread misinformation regarding Joe Biden's mental health. The bulletin, titled “Russia Likely to Denigrate Health of U.S. Candidates to Influence 2020 Election,” was blocked by the office of acting DHS Secretary Chad Wolf on July 9.
  • The bulletin states that analysts had “high confidence” in their conclusion. However, a DHS spokesperson tried to defend the “delay” in issuing the document by saying it did not meet the agency’s standards. This is curious because just a week later, on July 16, DHS circulated a bulletin on anarchists in Portland that officers admitted they had “low confidence” in. Why was the Russia memo held back but the Portland one released?
  • Trump has been pushing the same line of attack against Biden for months - yet another instance of Russia and Trump operating from the same playbook. For instance, in March Trump said there was “something going on” with Biden; in June Trump ran selectively edited ads asserting that Biden is “unfit to serve as Commander in Chief”; last month Trump ran a digital ad portraying Biden as perpetually confused and mentally unstable. Most recently, Trump said questions about his own health are only in the news because “they want to try and get me to be on Biden's physical level."
DHS is just the latest agency in the Trump administration to erode election security, following actions by the Justice Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) last month. DNI John Ratcliffe announced he was ending in-person congressional briefings on election security ahead of November and AG Bill Barr removed a leading career official at the Justice Department’s national security division, replacing him with an inexperienced political appointee.
The ODNI’s decision to halt congressional election briefs may have been influenced by top White House officials. National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien and Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, among others, have repeatedly discussed in meetings with staff and with Trump “how to restrict and control the flow of information on such sensitive topics to Capitol Hill.”
One White House official told The Daily Beast that Meadows has for months been wary of the type of briefings on Capitol Hill that Democratic sources can potentially use to try to make Trump look bad through surreptitious leaks to media outlets.
Meanwhile, interim Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee Marco Rubio (R-FL) said last week that his committee will be granted an exception to the ODNI’s new policy and continue to receive in-person briefings from top U.S. intelligence officials about election-security issues. This essentially means that only Democrat-led committees have been cut out of the process ensuring election security.
House Democrats wrote to Ratcliffe insinuating if his office does not provide the previously scheduled briefings this month they will issue subpoenas and/or defund the ODNI in the appropriations bill due by the end of the month. Read the letter here.
In addition to attacks on Biden’s health, DHS has determined that Russia is seeking to “amplify” concerns over the integrity of U.S. elections by promoting allegations that mail-in voting will lead to widespread fraud. Intelligence analysts say this strategy has been underway since at least March, coinciding with Trump’s own assaults on mail-in voting.
  • For instance, in March Trump said if he agreed to funding vote-by-mail expansions in the first coronavirus stimulus bill, the U.S. would see “levels of voting that, if you ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again” (clip). Fact check: Neither party has historically benefited. On April 7, at the White House press briefing, Trump claimed: "Mail ballots are a very dangerous thing for this country, because they're cheaters… They're fraudulent in many cases" (clip). Fact check: There is no evidence that mail ballots are dangerous or fraudulent.
At a White House press briefing on Friday, Trump denied there is any proof that Russia poisoned opposition leader Alexei Navalny. Instead of backing the German government's analysis of Nalvany's illness, Trump then redirected the criticism from Russia to China (clip).
"I don't know exactly what happened. I think it's tragic. It's terrible; it shouldn't happen. We haven't had any proof yet, but I will take a look. It is interesting that everybody is always mentioning Russia - and I don't mind you mentioning Russia - but I think probably China, at this point, is a nation that you should be talking about much more so than Russia. Because the things that China's doing are far worse.”
Trump then went on to say he’s “taken stronger action against Russia than any other country in the world,” but added “I do get along with President Putin” (clip).
  • RELATED: Leaked notes obtained by the Telegraph say that when Theresa May asked for Trump to take a strong stand after Russia poisoned Sergei Skripal, Trump replied “I’d rather follow than lead.” He pushed May to “put together a coalition” first.
The Trump administration plans to deport a Russian national living in America, a move experts say is in response to a politically motivated request by Russia. Gregory Duralev was persecuted by the Russian state for exposing corruption. He fled to America and applied for asylum in 2015. While waiting for a decision on his application, he was arrested by ICE and jailed for nearly 18 months. His case is now in court.
“DHS has acted no better than the Russian authorities,” Duralev said. “They simply fabricated charges against me for violations I never committed — and if DHS can trump up charges against immigrants with impunity, nobody can guarantee they won’t start doing it” to regular Americans. “So that’s the main message I now hope to send.”

Michael Cohen & Peter Strzok

Former FBI agent Peter Strzok has a book coming out called “Compromised.” In it, he alleges that FBI investigators came to believe it was “conceivable, if unlikely” that Russia was secretly controlling President Trump after he took office:
“We certainly had evidence that this was the case: that Trump, while gleefully wreaking havoc on America’s political institutions and norms, was pulling his punches when it came to our historic adversary, Russia,” Strzok writes. “Given what we knew or had cause to suspect about Trump’s compromising behavior in the weeks, months, and years leading up to the election, moreover, it also seemed conceivable, if unlikely, that Moscow had indeed pulled off the most stunning intelligence achievement in human history: secretly controlling the president of the United States — a Manchurian candidate elected.”
He now says he doesn’t believe that Trump is literally a Russian spy: “I don’t think that Trump, when he meets with Putin, receives a task list for the next quarter,” Strzok said, referencing the Russian president, Vladimir Putin. “But I do think the president is compromised, that he is unable to put the interests of our nation first, that he acts from hidden motives, because there is leverage over him, held specifically by the Russians but potentially others as well.”
In an interview with Politico, Strzok confirms that he and then-deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, opened a counterintelligence case on the president, but that it likely was never pursued. Two weeks ago, NYT reported that Rosenstein secretly closed it.
As if there weren’t enough political books coming out this summefall, Michael Cohen is releasing his, called “Disloyal: A Memoir.” The following a couple of quick takeaways:
Cohen says that he, Trump, Aras Agalarov, Emin Agalarov, and others, watched a strip show in Las Vegas where one performer simulated peeing on another performer, who pretended to drink it. Trump reportedly reacted with “delight.” Aras Agalarov, a Russian real estate mogul, is a trusted associate of Putin and reportedly served as a liaison between Trump and the Russian president during Trump’s trip to Moscow.
WaPo:
On Russia, Cohen writes that the cause behind Trump’s admiration of Russian President Vladimir Putin is simpler than many of his critics assume. Above all, he writes, Trump loves money — and he wrongly identified Putin as “the richest man in the world by a multiple.” Trump loved Putin, Cohen wrote, because the Russian leader had the ability “to take over an entire nation and run it like it was his personal company — like the Trump Organization, in fact.”
...According to Cohen, Trump’s sycophantic praise of the Russian leader during the 2016 campaign began as a way to suck up and ensure access to the oligarch’s money after he lost the election. But he claims Trump came to understand that Putin’s hatred of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, dating to her support for the 2011 protest movement in Russia, could also help Trump amass more power in the United States.

USPS & mail voting

According to a Washington Post report yesterday, Postmaster Louis DeJoy engaged in campaign money laundering, also called a straw-donor scheme, at his former logistics business. Five of his former employees told WaPo that they were “urged” to donate to politicians in North Carolina and would be paid back through bonuses from DeJoy. Such a plan would allow DeJoy to illegally circumvent campaign donation limits.
“Louis was a national fundraiser for the Republican Party. He asked employees for money. We gave him the money, and then he reciprocated by giving us big bonuses,” said David Young, DeJoy’s longtime director of human resources, who had access to payroll records at New Breed from the late 1990s to 2013 and is now retired.
“He would ask employees to make contributions at the same time that he would say, ‘I’ll get it back to you down the road,’ ” said [another] former employee.
...A Washington Post analysis of federal and state campaign finance records found a pattern of extensive donations by New Breed employees to Republican candidates, with the same amount often given by multiple people on the same day. Between 2000 and 2014, 124 individuals who worked for the company together gave more than $1 million to federal and state GOP candidates. Many had not previously made political donations, and have not made any since leaving the company, public records show.
More than one million mail-in ballots were sent late to voters during the 2020 primary elections, an audit by the USPS IG’s office determined. Most of the ballots were late, the USPS says, because local election boards sent the ballots to voters at the last minute. Official press release.
[The audit] found the problems during primaries had been most pronounced in Kentucky and New York, where a combined 628,000 ballots were sent out late. In 17 states, the audit found, more than 589,000 ballots were sent from election boards to voters after the state’s ballot mailing deadline. In 11 states, more than 44,000 ballots were sent from election boards to voters the day of or the day before the state’s primary election.
One particularly troubling situation, auditors found, unfolded in Pennsylvania, where 500 ballots were sent to voters the day after the election.
Furthermore, only 13% of the ballots were mailed with the recommended bar code tracking technology.
Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D) was blocked from attending two scheduled tours of USPS facilities last week. Local Postal Service officials informed her and union leaders waiting to accompany her into the building that national USPS leadership had directed them to bar the group from the building. A Postal Service spokeswoman said they simply needed more notice for a tour.
Many states, including important battleground states, are not legally permitted to process mail-in/absentee ballots until Election Day, leading to concern that results will be delayed by days or weeks. For instance, in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan election officials cannot even begin processing ballots until Election Day. Processing involves opening envelopes, flattening ballots to run through the scanning machine, and prepping for the scanning.
"When voters have to wait so long for results, it erodes trust in the process and leaves room for partisan bad actors to dispute the will of the people," said Amber McReynolds, CEO of the National Vote at Home Institute, a nonprofit organization.
AG Bill Barr made three stunning false claims about mail voting during an interview with Wolf Blitzer last week. First, Barr wouldn’t even acknowledge that voting twice is a crime - because just hours earlier, Trump encouraged his North Carolina supporters to vote twice to “test” the state’s mail-in voting system (clip).
BLITZER: It sounds like he’s encouraging people to break the law and try to vote twice.
BARR: It seems to me what he’s saying is, he’s trying to make the point that the ability to monitor this system is not good. And it was so good, if you tried to vote a second time you would be caught if you voted in person.
BLITZER: That would be illegal if they did that. If somebody mailed in a ballot and then actually showed up to vote in person, that would be illegal.
BARR: "I don't know what the law in the particular state says.”
BLITZER: You can’t vote twice.
BARR: "I don't know what the law in the particular state says.”
Then, Barr tried to assert that foreign countries could fake ballots, but when challenged he admitted he had no evidence (clip).
BLITZER: You’ve said you were worried that a foreign country could send thousands of fake ballots, thousands of fake ballots to people that it might be impossible to detect. What are you basing that on?
BARR: I’m basing — as I’ve said repeatedly, I’m basing that on logic.
BLITZER: Pardon?
BARR: Logic.
Finally, Barr cited a supposed incident of mail-in voting fraud in Texas. Too bad it doesn’t exist.

The payroll

Charles Rettig, the Trump-appointed IRS Commissioner who has refused to release President Trump’s tax returns, has made hundreds of thousands of dollars renting out Trump properties while in office. Rettig makes $100,000 - $200,000 a year from two units at Trump International Waikiki. When first nominated, Rettig failed to disclose his financial ties to Trump Waikiki. When questioned by Congress, he did not directly answer concerns about the properties.
CREW: With Trump’s name removed from some buildings as it began to hurt property values, we can only imagine how toxic it would become if a bombshell in his tax returns were released. Which means the IRS Commissioner has a vested interest in the success of the Trump brand—and of preventing anything that could damage it.
Voice of America staffers say Trump appointee Michael Pack is threatening to wash away legal protections intended to insulate their news reports from political meddling. Since arriving, Pack has fired the network's leaders, pushed out agency executives, refused to approve allotted budgets, and refused to renew visas for foreign employees.
  • Further reading: “Deleted Biden video sets off a crisis at Voice of America,” Politico.
Pack suggested the staff he fired and foreign journalists he essentially kicked out may have been foreign spies, without offering any evidence to support his claim. A group of 14 senior VOA journalists are openly disputing his explanation:
“Mr. Pack has made a thin excuse that his actions are meant to protect national security, but just as was the case with the McCarthy ‘Red Scare,’ which targeted VOA and other government organizations in the mid-1950s, there has not been a single demonstrable case of any individual working for VOA — as the USAGM CEO puts it — ‘posing as a spy,’ ” they wrote.
The White House is searching for a replacement for Federal Trade Commission Chair Joe Simons, a Republican who has publicly resisted President Donald Trump’s efforts to crack down on social media companies. Simons, a veteran antitrust lawyer, cannot legally be removed by the president except in cases of gross negligence. But the White House has already interviewed at least one candidate for the post.
  • RELATED: The Justice Department plans to bring an antitrust case against Google as soon as this month, after Attorney General William P. Barr overruled career lawyers who said they needed more time to build a strong case.
Richard Grenell, formerly the highest-ranking out gay official in the Trump administration, has joined a law firm founded by Pat Robertson that has a history of opposing LGBTQ+ rights. Grenell also recently joined the Republican National Committee to do outreach to LGBTQ+ voters.
The Trump administration has quietly named a new acting State Department inspector general. Matthew Klimow, the U.S. ambassador to Turkmenistan since mid-2019, is the third acting IG since Trump and Pompeo ousted Senate-confirmed IG Steve Linick in May.
Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s current special envoy to Northern Ireland, former Chief of Staff, and former acting head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, is starting a hedge fund focused on financial services regulation. Ethics experts say Mulvaney explicitly using his knowledge of CFPB to place bets for and against companies gives him an unfair and perhaps illegal advantage.

Court and DOJ matters

Court cases
The Trump administration must, for now, stop winding down in-person counting efforts for the 2020 census, a federal judge in California ordered.
The three-judge panel hearing a challenge to Trump’s new anti-immigrant census policy seemed hostile to the government’s arguments in a hearing last week.
A federal judge has stopped the Trump administration from enforcing a rule change that would let health care providers deny medical services to LGBTQ patients on the grounds of religion.
Justice Department
Federal prosecutors are preparing to charge longtime GOP fundraiser Elliott Broidy in connection with efforts to influence the U.S. government on behalf of foreign interests. Broidy helped raise millions for Donald Trump’s election and the Republican Party.
Barr ordered another round of changes to FISA rules, tightening the use of government surveillance on political candidates or their staffers — a move conservatives will likely cheer, as they have long criticized how the FBI investigated the Trump campaign in 2016.
Before conducting physical searches or wiretaps of a federal election official, members of the official's staff, candidates for federal office, or their staff or advisers, the FBI must now consider giving them a "defensive briefing," to tell them that they could be the target of foreign influence.
submitted by rusticgorilla to Keep_Track [link] [comments]

I decided to read the OpIndia Report on the Delhi Riots and sacrifice my brain cells to this malevolent community. (Part 1 of many)

(This is the first in a series on a potentially brain-damaging rundown on the OpIndia "report" on the Delhi Riots).

A Preface to the Idiocy that lies ahead

The barbaric bigoted fearmongers of the chaddi shit rag that is OpIndia had generated quite the buzz for their "350 page report on the Delhi Riots 2020." A chaddi on twitter went insofar as to hail it as the first time he has seen, in 30-35 years, "a right winger do a systematic study of a riot, and expose the culprits."
The Amazon reviews pick up the baton of showering praise from their ideologically incestuous brethren over at Twitter. "It's an detailed and we'll researched reading. Must read for truth" (sic), reads the top review. Scroll past all the praise-showering and you will eventually stumble upon a one-star review from a disgruntled individual; a sort of vindication for the pitiable person for having spent Rs. 101 "on this propoganda piece by some fake news peddlers" (sic).
Run the Amazon link through ReviewMeta, and you begin to see the first of the many oh-so-beautiful cracks and the cesspool of worms that lie beneath this tomb of the Sanatani's Manufacturing Consent. 513 reviews (86% of the total) were created in just two days, with the average ratings on both days being 4.9 and 4.8, about as organic as a hormone-infused McSpicy Chicken. 370 of the 598 reviews were from unverified purchases (no surprises here, lest a large majority of the saffroncels have become aware that piracy is also useful for things outside of video games and porno).

Prologue: begging bowls, shitty flowcharts, and twitter-tier dog-whistling

The appeal (AKA plz giu our daddies monies)

The not-a-journalist editor of OpIndia (Nupur J Sharma) slaps the reader, right off the bat, with an attack on the Muslim community at large (the "peacefuls" remark, an oft-used dog-whistle by brain-dead chaddis on the internet).
Recent years have brought to fore the nefarious intents of certain sections of the society, whom we shall refer to as ‘peacefuls’. In the name of spreading ‘peace’ and ‘harmony’, they undertake some of the most evil acts, the most recent (at the time of writing this appeal) of which were the Delhi riots of 2020.
I shall respect the authors' modus operandi by emulating it; henceforth I shall address OpIndia and anyone affiliated with it as 💩💩💩OpIndia💩💩💩.

The Flowcharts

💩💩💩OpIndia💩💩💩's amateur flowcharts give the impression that a paranoid schizo is locked in their office's basement; walls littered with mind-maps linking anything to just about everything.
Flowchart 1, Flowchart 2, and Flowchart 3
gRaPHiC DeSigN Is mY PasSiON.

The 💩💩💩"Editor's"💩💩💩 Note

The 💩💩💩"Editor"💩💩💩 concocts a "foundational promise" of the Republic of India: the CAA was the fulfillment of the "sacred oath" of the "initial leaders of the Republic". Who these leaders are, no one knows. Sure as hell not the ones that banned the RSS for playing a role in Gandhi's assassination (the chaddi 's appropriated poster-boy Sardar Patel had ironically heralded this decision).
I'm just going to leave this here. SelfAwareWolves ain't got shit on this
...the cycle of fake news, blatant lies, misrepresentations, fear-mongering and carnage that was unleashed against Hindus...
Moving on, the 💩💩💩"Editor"💩💩💩 makes the ye olde assumption that Islam is one single, homogeneous religion with absolutely noooo sects, differences in practices, and even fissures in it. This is such that it snugly fits their black-and-white narrative that all Islam is radical Islam. The reality, quite obviously, is far from it. Most terror activities across the globe proliferated under the label of "Islam" are by Deoband, Salafi, and Wahhabi ideologues, and are often more violent and oppressive to the other Muslim minorities in their respective "Islamic" countries than they are to other nations.
The attacks on Muslims by the radical Hindutva would surely usurp the numbers on 'Radical Islamic Terrorism'. It also doesn't help that "terrorism" has no concrete definition. But never mind that, nOt aLL MuSLimS ArE TerROrIsTS BuT All tErRoRisTs aRE MUSliM.
The 💩💩💩"Editor"💩💩💩 proceeds to christen his note by making the same ol' diarrheatic khichdi of ideologies, coalescing the "Left" and the "Islamists". This shtick is getting boring 💩💩💩OpIndia💩💩💩, at least try to put in some effort for a change.
The 💩💩💩"Editor"💩💩💩 then brings up something about "the Gandhian dystopia", probably referring to Gandhi's "dystopia" of trying to prevent the partition of India and Pakistan.The "Left's" objection is then put forth: "why are Muslims being left out when all others are being given the chance to become Indian citizens." Well, they aren't all too wrong on this front I suppose.
Nevertheless, their refutations are just about delusional as the aforementioned schizo locked in their basement.
...the majority population of those nations. Muslims, in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh belong to the majority religion and thus, CAA could not have included Muslims of Islamic nations.
Yet again, treating the Islamic community as a whole as a singular Homogeneous entity without any rifts and conflicts among each other (cough Shia, Sunnis, Sufis, Rohingyas cough).The 💩💩💩"Editor"💩💩💩 pulls yet another straw-man, claiming that the "Left" and the "Islamists" were telling the Hindus that the exclusion of Muslims in the CAA would alienate Indian Muslims.
No one worth their salt has made such claims. At least, not on the CAA. The NRC, on the other hand...
They also put the onus of condemnation on Indian Muslims for atrocities committed by extremists in other "Islamic" countries, that this is imperative in "bridging the deficit of trust... due to the lack of acknowledgement of such basic truths". Youtuber Shaun has a great response to this loaded allegation
...India has no legal obligation to accept international refugees...
Offered without comment.

The Executive Summary (basically the only thing you should read in this "report", should you choose to kill some of your brain cells)

The rich ancient civilization of India that was ravaged by Islamic invasion and the religion-based partition left deep scars in the very soul of the nation, leaving the indigenous Hindu population of the country bruised and battered.
😭😭😭 MUZZ MUZZ MUGALS BABURR DESTROY AWAR ANCHIENT DHARMIC CIVILIJATION 😭😭😭
The 💩💩💩 author 💩💩💩 then tries to prop up the concept of Ummah, as if to establish that every Islamic nation would accept every Muslim as they "belong to the same theological ‘country’ regardless of political borders". To put it simply, Ummah is a non-existent wet dream concocted by the likes of Zakir Naik and the folks at MEMRI TV; a fantasy similar to the Chaddis' Akhand Bharat.
They then lay out the violence that played out on the 15th of December, 2019, with more remorse and tears shed over the buses that burnt, and propounding the debunked claim that chants of "Hinduon se Azadi" were raised in the very area. They proudly proclaim how the Delhi Police stormed the Jamia Milia University campus "to flush out the miscreants", conveniently eliminating the fact that ABVP goons had attacked the protesters, while the police watched. All that lathi-charging and tear-gassing in the University's library and women being molested was the bloody right thing to do to those gosh-darned "miscreants", wasn't it?
I am NOT going to talk about the "road block" in Shaheen Bagh. Read this if you really care about the commute time of a champagne-sipping Delhiite in his BMW, who would be enraged by thought of the slightest of a traffic delay anyway.
...a minor had opened fire at the anti-CAA protests in Jamia...
Who might this minor be? The kid had shot at a student protester, after shouting "ye lo azaadi". Props to 💩💩💩 OpIndia 💩💩💩 though, for at least trying their hand at journalistic integrity.
...Kapil Gujjar, associated with the Aam Aadmi Party, had fired three shots at Shaheen Bagh.
Gujjar's father admittedly told to ANI that his son is a supporter of Modi, and always spoke of Hindustan and Hindutva. His affiliation to the AAP ended with him wearing that topi when they were campaigning in his area. Nevertheless, props to 💩💩💩 OpIndia 💩💩💩 for trying.
The ONE thing I agree with them is that it was wrong to take a four month-old baby to the protests. But that's about it. It's like the bare minimum that everyone would find it difficult to disagree with.
On the question of activist Teesta Setalvad "tutoring" Shaheen Bagh protesters, I only found the same Times Now link, which basically shows her educating the other protestors on the allegation levied against them. Make of it what you will.
The 💩💩💩 author 💩💩💩 alleges that the 500 women who had held a protest outside of the Jaffrabad Metro Station were being led by "the far-left" Pinjra Tod activists, when there isn't any evidence to substantiate her instigating the protestors. In fact, Bhim Army chief Chandrashekhar Azad (who had more of a role to play in this than the Pinjra tod woman) had stated that the objective of the protest was in retaliation to the SC's remarks on reservation being unnecessary for promotions, along with the CAA and NRC. He too had insisted that the protests be peaceful, and that the women should not give in to the provocations of the BJP.
The 💩💩💩 author 💩💩💩 conveniently glosses over the speeches and remarks of Kapil Mishra and his cadre, choosing to say something so benign:
He emphasized that they would not listen to anyone if the Anti-CAA rioters do not shift and clear the roads within the given time
Everyone knows about the shit storm that Kapil Mishra brewed. Even lizard man Zuckerberg. Who would want to forget the junior Finance Minister's eloquent saying "desh ke gaddaron ko..." you know the rest.
A great deal of property has been damaged across the national capital.
😭😭😭 MUH BUSSES 😭😭😭
On the issue of the statement made by a Ladeeda Sakhaloon, sure what she said was gravely controversial making calls for jihad and whatnot (allegedly, I don't know the truth of this matter in its entirety). But to that, I raise you a Kapil Mishra. As for Sharjeel Imam, well, he's yet another controversial figure who has said some things on par with the Saffron cadre's rhetoric, but bringing up his personal views on Jinnah plays no role in his alleged sowing the "seeds of chaos". What the 💩💩💩 author 💩💩💩 fails to understand is that such grassroots movements do not require the gaze of a megalomaniac or their STREANH. They're grassroots movements with a more or less absent hierarchy or an immaculately orchestrated order.
Petrol bombs, sacks full of brick pieces, stones, acid packs and even catapults to hurl the stones have been spotted at AAP Councilor Tahir Hussain’s rooftop.
I'll just leave this here. There is enough to establish that the Delhi Police had colluded with the radical Hindutva extremists. Any instance of the Delhi Police being brought up as a substantive source of evidence, without any secondary evidential buttressing, is a moot point.
An addendum: The 💩💩💩 author 💩💩💩 decides to throw in a Tywin Lannister (yes, the Game of Thrones character) quote in a "report" on the Delhi Riots, and then expects to be taken seriously. Kek.

The CAA Straw-man

I'm not going to explain and elaborate on what the CAA or the NRC is here. Look it up, you lazy shits. I shall proceed to answer their 'FAQs' on the CAA though, for shits and giggles.
Does the CAA affect any Indian citizen?
No. But the NRC does.
Who does the CAA apply to?
Everyone who isn't a Muslim. Any Muslim from any sect, because "Ummah", Shia-Sunni bhai bhai :)
How does it benefit Hindu, Sikh, Jain, Buddhist, Parsi and Christian foreigners hailing from these three countries?
Quick as fuck citizenship, owing to their identity as persecuted migrants.
Does this mean that Muslims from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan can never get Indian citizenship?
Theoretically, no. But, the 💩💩💩 author 💩💩💩 considers all Muslims to be one, and ignores the minority crises of other Muslim sects in these countries, and is hedging her bets on "Ummah".
Will illegal Muslim immigrants from these three countries be deported under the CAA?
No, but the NRC might.
Can Hindus facing persecution on grounds of religion in countries other than these 3 countries apply under the CAA?
No. Ro chindu ro. Only if time travel were possible, then the CAA would have rescued the Hindus from Islamic 'genocide' by the Mughals... and the Rajcucks.
Does the CAA also cover other forms of persecution – on grounds of race, gender, membership of a political or social group, language, ethnicity etc.?
No. Only Dharma important in New India.
The CAA will gradually exclude Indian Muslims from the citizenship of India?
No. But the NRC might.
CAA will be followed by NRC and all migrants except Muslims will be given citizenship and Muslims will be sent to detention camps?
Aap Chronology samajhiye
What are the rules for citizenship under CAA?
Who the fuck knows. I'd be amazed if Amit Shah does.
Why shouldn’t Baluchis, Ahmadiyya in Pakistan, Rohingyas in Myanmar not be considered for this kindness?
"Ummah"
Doesn’t India have an obligation under the UN to take care of refugees?
No it does not. Kudos to the 💩💩💩 author 💩💩💩 for getting at least something right.
Will illegal Muslims immigrants from these three countries be automatically deported under this Law?
Through the NRC, yes. Just a reminder, CAA is not the same as the NRC.
Does the CAA affect Indians (Hindus, Muslims, anyone)?
No. But the NRC might.
What about Sri Lankan Tamils?
Abandoned and forgotten. Nobody cares about them as there isn't any milk left in that political teat.
Why only these three countries? And why only religious persecution of above-notified denominations?
Because the mentioned religions are in the minority in the neighbouring Muslims countries, and as we all know, Islam has absolutely noooo divisions or sects or variations in practice, and some of them aren't a minority themselves in these 'Muslim-majority' countries
Does this mean that Muslims from these 3 countries can never get Indian citizenship?
They can. But they would not have the fast-tracked benefits that the other persecuted faiths have. But the 💩💩💩 author 💩💩💩, once again makes the assumption that Islam is one big, homogeneous entity. For fuck's sake 💩💩💩 Nupur 💩💩💩, read up a bit on contemporary Islam, will you?
the CAA applies to the religious minorities of only three countries: Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. If a Hindu is found to be non-citizen after the NRC procedure is completed, he or she will have to prove that he indeed came from one of the three countries in order to benefit from the CAA. And that is practically impossible. So, in essence, the Hindu will be in the same boat as the Muslim non-citizen.
The 💩💩💩 author 💩💩💩 is saying that a Hindu and Muslim "non-citizen" are on the same boat, despite having literally mentioned a few paragraphs before this that "persecuted minorities" will have a fast-tracked citizenship process. It takes a great amount of skill to contradict yourself in the span of a few paragraphs.
Shias, Ahmadiyya and Rohingya Muslims are Muslims; they are all adherents of the Islamic faith. They only belong to different sects within Islam. Thus, the provisions of a law that is dedicated towards providing relief to victims of religious persecution can, naturally, not apply to the said Islamic sects.
Shia-Sunni-Sufi-Rohingya-Salafi-Deobandi... (you get the gist) bhai bhai right, 💩💩💩 Nupurji 💩💩💩? cue Ummah orgasm sounds

The Harish Salve verbal diarrhea

The 💩💩💩 author 💩💩💩 brings up an interview with Harish Salve by Rahul "WhatsApp Forward" Shivshankar. I'm not going to refute Salve's claims. You can read this refutation by another lawyer though. Nevertheless, here are some of the highlights:
Answering Shivshankar’s question on whether specifying Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Parsis, Buddhists and Christians is discriminatory against Muslims, Salve explained that the laws of equality do not mean having the same law for lions and lambs.

...since the CAB has ‘religious persecution’ as the basis and is aiding those who are being religiously persecuted (the minorities in the specified Islamic countries) then the community which belongs to the majority religion in these countries cannot claim ‘religious persecution’.

...Salve stated that the countries specified in the CAB have their own state religion and Islamic rules. He added that Islamic majority nations identify their people as per who follows Islam and who does not.

For argument’s sake, Salve stated, if immigration or naturalization facilities are provided to the Rohingyas, it can also be argued that why people from African nations are not being included.

Muslim Nations often persecute certain sections of the Muslim community (and Ahmadiyyas are Muslims) because they claim that certain sects are not following the ‘true’ version of Islam. Hindus, cannot be held responsible for the internal troubles of the Muslim world. That is something that the Muslim world needs to reform to tackle all on its own.

India has risen like a phoenix from the ashes of the funeral pyres of 1947.
A caveat: That last quote probably wasn't said by Salve, it is an insertion by 💩💩💩 Nupurji 💩💩💩, I presume. Still better than that Lannister quote I guess.

That's it for part 1, folks. Part 2 will be posted whenever I fucking feel like it (tbh mostly in a week or so)
submitted by meinhoonjeff to librandu [link] [comments]

Daily Megathread (18/03/2020) - Coronavirus Developments

🔗 COVID-19 links
NHS: 🦟 COVID-19 Info 🏥 NHS 111 Service
Govt: ℹ General Info ℹ Social Distancing Info
ukpol: 🥕🥕 data dashboard 📺 BBC News (Twitch) 📅 Week in Parliament
📈 Current figures as of 9am, 18th March: 2,626 (+676) confirmed cases. 69 (updated later today) people have died.

Overview

Coronavirus Bill

The Coronavirus Bill will be introduced to the House of Commons today. The Bill sets out various powers that the Government can introduce at any time. The legislation is time-limited for two years.
According to the Government, it will do the following:

Health and social care

  • Remove barriers so that recently retired NHS staff and social workers can return to work, along with students near the end of their training
  • Allow employees to take Emergency Volunteer Leave and be compensated for loss of earnings through a UK-wide compensation fund
  • Provide indemnity for clinical negligence liabilities arising from NHS activities carried out to deal with COVID-19, where there is no existing indemnity arrangement in place
  • Reduce the number of admin tasks for frontline staff, allow local authorities to prioritise care, allow more tasks to be done remotely, and allow suspension of individual port operations
  • Suspend the rule that prevents some NHS staff from working more than 16 hours per week after returning from retirement, along with other rules that apply to retirees
  • Detaining and treating people under the Mental Health Act requires just one doctor's opinion (currently you need two)
  • Temporarily remove some time limits in mental health legislation in the case of low staff numbers
  • Allow NHS providers to delay assessment for continued care for individuals being discharged from hospital until after the emergency period has ended
  • Changes to existing care legislation to allow local authorities to prioritise the services they offer

Other frontline staff

  • Provide powers to require educational institutions or childcare providers to stay open (ie by reducing teacher ratios)
  • Temporarily relax local authorities duties which require them to conduct a needs assessment and prepare an adult carer support plan/young care statement
  • Provide powers for the Home Secretary to suspend operations at ports and airports if Border Force staff shortages become a problem
  • Expand availability of video and audio link in court proceedings
  • Ensure the Treasury can transact its business at all times by making it possible for a single commissioneTreasury minister to sign instruments (currently requires two)
  • Allow temporary judicial commissioners (JCs) to be appointed at the request of the Investigatory Powers Commissioner in case of insufficient numbers of JCs

Delaying the virus

  • Provide powers to restrict or prohibit events and gatherings during the pandemic
  • Provide a temporary power to close schools and childcare providers
  • Postpone the local, mayoral and Police and Crime Commissioner elections that were due to take place in England in May this year until May 2021 (other elections including by-elections will also be postponed this year)
  • Enable the departments of health in NI and Scotland to make regulations for additional measures to help them delay the virus (England already has this)
  • Remove a restriction in how Scottish territorial Health Boards can deliver vaccination programmes so that more healthcare professionals in Scotland would be able to administer a vaccine
  • Adds powers to strengthen the quarantine powers of police and immigration officers

Managing the deceased

  • A coroner is only to be notified where a doctor believes there is no medical practitioner who may sign the death certificate
  • Introduce powers to enable the provisions under the Burial and Cremation (Scotland) Act 2016 relating to the collection of ashes to be suspended and replaced with a duty to retain until the suspension is lifted
  • Expand the list of people who can register a death to include funeral directors acting on behalf of the family
  • Enable electronic transmission of documents in order to certify the registration of a death
  • Remove the need for a second confirmatory medical certificate in order for a cremation to take place
  • Remove the law requirement that any inquest into a COVID-19 death must be held with a jury
  • Provide powers to suspend the referral of certificates to the Death Certification Review Service (DCRS) for review in Scotland

Supporting people

  • Provides powers to temporarily suspend the rule that means SSP is not paid for the first 3 days of work that you miss because of sickness
  • Enable employers with less than 250 employees to reclaim SSP paid for sickness relating to coronavirus during the period of the outbreak
  • Require industry to provide information about food supplies, in the event that an industry partner does not co-operate with current voluntary information-sharing arrangements

Financial support for businesses

The Treasury has announced some new measures for businesses to help deal with the COVID-19 outbreak, which are in addition to existing Budget:
  1. £330bn of guaranteed Government-backed loans (equiv to 15% of GDP). If demand is greater, as much capacity as required will be provided.
  2. New legal power in COVID Bill to provide whatever financial support is necessary in future
  3. Potential support package for airlines and airports after discussing with DfT - ministers speaking to affected businesses in other sectors
  4. Business with insurance policies covering pandemics should receive pay outs as the Government action is good enough.
  5. Businesses in retail/hospitality/leisure sector will receive a £25k cash grant if they have a rateable value of less than £51k.
  6. No business rates this year for any business in the retail/hospitality/leisure sector regardless of rateable value.
  7. 3 month mortgage holiday for those affected by the virus.
Further measures will be announced over the coming days.

COVID-19

Coronavirus (COVID-19) is a new illness which features flu-like symptoms and currently has no vaccine. The World Health Organisation (WHO) declared the current outbreak of the virus as a pandemic on 11th March. The UK Govt's action plan sets out the UK's response to the pandemic. There are several "phases" to the plan, with the UK currently in the delay phase:
  • The "contain" phase: detect early cases, follow up close contacts, and prevent the disease spreading for as long as possible
  • The "delay" phase: slow the spread of the disease, which could include closing schools and cancelling public events
  • The "research" phase: work to develop effective care for the disease
  • The "mitigate" phase: minimise the impact of the disease on society

Current Government advice/approach

As of 16th March
  • To minimise your chance of catching the illness, wash your hands frequently for a duration of 20 seconds.
  • If you or someone in your family has a new persistent cough or high temperature:
    • If you live alone: self-isolate for 7 days.
    • If you live in a shared household (e.g. with friends, family etc.): you should all self-isolate for 14 days (even if not everyone develops symptoms).
  • If you don't have symptoms or no-one in your household has symptoms, stop non-essential contact with others and stop unnecessary travel. Work from home. Avoid pubs, clubs, theatres, etc.
  • Those with the most serious health conditions should be shielded from contact with others for around 12 weeks
  • From tomorrow, 17th March, emergency workers will no longer support mass gatherings "like they normally do"
  • If you suspect that you are infected with coronavirus, you should first use the NHS online service. Only call 111 if the service advises you to. Do not visit your GP as you risk infecting others.
For NHS info and help on coronavirus, see this page.

Meta notices

  • Don't forget that this Sunday is Mothers Day. If your mother is anything like mine, a bottle of gin is probably the best bet as it has multiple uses, including preservation (mummification, aha!), hand washing, paint stripper, degreaser, heat and light source, antifreeze and in cases of real desperation, you can drink it. /s

COVID-19 submissions

We ask that - for now - the majority of coronavirus discussion happens within these daily megathreads. Only make new threads for notable developments. Standalone submissions are acceptable for notable developments, including new cases and deaths (e.g DHSC tweets/page), new Government advice, and notable political news. Examples of what we are removing include general commentary/hot takes/opinion pieces about the virus, and news about other countries which bear no relation to the UK (e.g news about Italy or China).

Misinformation

Reddit is not a source of professional medical advice. Users can and will post inaccurate transmission methods, prevention methods, cures, and other misinformation. Please report any obvious misinformation that you see and we will take action. Send us a modmail if you are concerned about a user's behaviour. Always use the NHS 111 online service as your first port of call for COVID-19 information.
submitted by ukpolbot to ukpolitics [link] [comments]

IoM vs UK for relocation [Anonymous!]

Hi,
I apologise for using a throwaway account, but I was looking for some confidential advise.. I'm currently based in Asia and I've been offered an opportunity with a partner to build a new business (food related) in Europe. The bulk of the business is to bet set-up in the United Kingdom (mostly big cities of London, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool) and gradually spread to other parts of the EU.
Now I've been offered the option to either have the UK as a home base for the business or the Isle of Man. Not just for tax reasons, but I'd really like to choose the Isle of Man as a base/HQ. However, my concern is primarily on two fronts..
- My work will make me spend over 180 days a year in the UK for setting up and building business. I'm worried this might upset both IoM authorities and UK Tax authorities.
- My wife wants our son to study at a school near London and therefore we'll have a second home there where she and my son will primarily spend their time (and of course, I'll spend enough time there too). This further aggravates my concern on upsetting the IoM and UK Tax authorities.
Is this plan feasible? Is it practical to be based (legally and technically) in the Isle of Man while having an extensive UK life? Or is it best to send my son to an IoM school (I will still be in the UK more than 180 days a year to develop business).
On a related note.. my wife and I are big-city folk. Would Isle of Man seem too small for what we're used to?
submitted by anonymous4obvious to IsleofMan [link] [comments]

(Mainly) UK Tax question for a Sunday Morning

Hi
This is something more of a curiosity. In the UK we can trade Forex using spread betting so any gains are totally tax free.
However, lets say for some reason you were using a different method. Maybe you were using a broker in another country, or trading Forex using a CFD account. What asset is Forex categorised under for Capital Gains Tax (CGT)?
Looking at the government CGT website, it includes shares as being subject to CGT but not Forex, it does also state that selling coins is subject to it. However, Forex is neither shares nor coins; coins being physical objects.
And just thinking of this as I type, it also states that CGT is paid on assets. It's arguable though that currency isn't an asset but merely a tool used to purchase assets. After all, there is the often used distinction of people being "cash rich" or "asset rich". Doesn't it blur the line between the distinction of money and assets if you have to pay a tax which is meant to be applied to an increase in value of an asset itself rather than means of exchange?
I'm sure there's plenty of legal rulings on this, and this sub will be quite biased on the subject (shouldn't be taxed). Wondering on peoples thoughts on the later.
Having a few showerthoughts this morning.
submitted by MrFanciful to Forex [link] [comments]

Evening Megathread (17/03/2020) - Treasury announces further COVID-19 support for businesses

🔗 COVID-19 links
NHS: ℹ COVID-19 Info 🏥 NHS 111 Service
Govt: ℹ General Info ℹ Social Distancing Info
ukpol: 🥕🥕 data dashboard 📺 BBC News livestream (Twitch)
📈 Current figures as of 9am, 17th March: 1,950 (+407) confirmed cases. 69 (+14) people have died.

Overview

The Treasury has announced some new measures for businesses to help deal with the COVID-19 outbreak, which are in addition to existing Budget:
  1. £330bn of guaranteed Government-backed loans (equiv to 15% of GDP). If demand is greater, as much capacity as required will be provided.
  2. New legal power in COVID Bill& to provide whatever financial support is necessary in future
  3. Potential support package for airlines and airports after discussing with DfT - ministers speaking to affected businesses in other sectors
  4. Business with insurance policies covering pandemics should receive pay outs as the Government action is good enough.
  5. Businesses in retail/hospitality/leisure sector will receive a £25k cash grant if they have a rateable value of less than £51k.
  6. No business rates this year for any business in the retail/hospitality/leisure sector regardless of rateable value.
  7. 3 month mortgage holiday for those affected by the virus.
Please ping jaydenkieran if any of this is inaccurate
The Chancellor Rishi Sunak will give a statement to the House of Commons at 19:00 GMT. Watch here.

COVID-19

Coronavirus (COVID-19) is a new illness which features flu-like symptoms and currently has no vaccine. The World Health Organisation (WHO) declared the current outbreak of the virus as a pandemic on 11th March. The UK Govt's action plan sets out the UK's response to the pandemic. There are several "phases" to the plan, with the UK currently in the delay phase:
  • The "contain" phase: detect early cases, follow up close contacts, and prevent the disease spreading for as long as possible
  • The "delay" phase: slow the spread of the disease, which could include closing schools and cancelling public events
  • The "research" phase: work to develop effective care for the disease
  • The "mitigate" phase: minimise the impact of the disease on society

Current Government advice/approach

As of 16th March
  • To minimise your chance of catching the illness, wash your hands frequently for a duration of 20 seconds.
  • If you or someone in your family has a new persistent cough or high temperature:
    • If you live alone: self-isolate for 7 days.
    • If you live in a shared household (e.g. with friends, family etc.): you should all self-isolate for 14 days (even if not everyone develops symptoms).
  • If you don't have symptoms or no-one in your household has symptoms, stop non-essential contact with others and stop unnecessary travel. Work from home. Avoid pubs, clubs, theatres, etc.
  • Those with the most serious health conditions should be shielded from contact with others for around 12 weeks
  • From tomorrow, 17th March, emergency workers will no longer support mass gatherings "like they normally do"
  • If you suspect that you are infected with coronavirus, you should first use the NHS online service. Only call 111 if the service advises you to. Do not visit your GP as you risk infecting others.
For NHS info and help on coronavirus, see this page.

Meta notices

  • Don't forget that this Sunday is Mothers Day. If your mother is anything like mine, a bottle of gin is probably the best bet as it has multiple uses, including preservation (mummification, aha!), hand washing, paint stripper, degreaser, heat and light source, antifreeze and in cases of real desperation, you can drink it. /s

COVID-19 submissions

We ask that - for now - the majority of coronavirus discussion happens within these daily megathreads. Only make new threads for notable developments. Standalone submissions are acceptable for notable developments, including new cases and deaths (e.g DHSC tweets/page), new Government advice, and notable political news. Examples of what we are removing include general commentary/hot takes/opinion pieces about the virus, and news about other countries which bear no relation to the UK (e.g news about Italy or China).

Misinformation

Reddit is not a source of professional medical advice. Users can and will post inaccurate transmission methods, prevention methods, cures, and other misinformation. Please report any obvious misinformation that you see and we will take action. Send us a modmail if you are concerned about a user's behaviour. Always use the NHS 111 online service as your first port of call for COVID-19 information.
submitted by ukpolbot to ukpolitics [link] [comments]

Online gambling legislation and regulation. Starting your own gambling product.

Online gambling legislation and regulation. Starting your own gambling product.

Mobile gambling
If you plan to develop an app with the ability to deposit and withdraw real money, then such a product automatically falls into the category of gambling and you will need to license your business for successful operation.
Mobile and Web Based Apps
So let’s talk about the different kinds of online gambling apps available on web and mobile. We’ll be covering both free-play gaming apps and real money casino app games you can find for iOS, Android devices and web browsers.
Mobile gambling is more common for poker, casino, bingo, and skill games. They have advantages in terms of a low barrier to enter the market, instant liquidity, product knowledge, and marketing expertise, minimal infrastructure costs, and the ability to bring a brand to the market quickly. Consequently, this form of gambling does not sit neatly with jurisdictional boundaries. Multiple gambling opportunities are available, including betting on various events and markets, in a relatively simple format. Gambling products can also be integrated into betting on television shows or virtual racing and sports games as well as offering lotteries, bingo, poker and casino games.
Most Popular Gambling Apps
Sports betting, casino, poker and lotteries are the most popular forms of online gambling. However, other forms are available too. These include the following: Bingo, slot machines, different card games, roulette and other game of chance. One of the best things about online gambling and betting apps is the number of choices you have.

Sports Betting

Betting means making or accepting a bet on the outcome of a race, competition, or other event or process, the likelihood of anything occurring or not occurring, or whether anything is or is not true. Today most sports betting is done via mobile-friendly sites and apps.
Today most sports betting is done via mobile-friendly sites and apps.
The introduction of live betting for sports like soccer and tennis means that bettors who are sitting inside stadiums watching games can now pick up their mobile devices and find real-time betting value with the best sports gambling apps. This has really unlocked a door to the future of sports gambling and the popularity of online gambling apps.

Poker

Many sites offer free poker, where no real money is wagered, although in some cases players can accumulate credits that can be exchanged for prizes. This is the case why people are going to play for real money. There is an ongoing debate over whether poker should be classified as a game of chance or skill. The parameters of legal poker playing are still unclear and differ between jurisdictions. Since you are not gambling with money, I’m pretty sure under the law it’s just a video game for now.

Blackjack

Blackjack is the game of choice to many high-rollers and do you know why? Because blackjack is a challenging, logic and skill-based game where your thinking, strategy, and calculations determine the outcome of the game.

Bingo

Bingo is one of the most popular and socially accepted games in the world. Bingo is a traditional form of gambling that has seen considerable innovation in recent years. It is also the only form of gambling recognized in the Gambling Act that does not have a specific statutory definition, the Act providing simply that “bingo” means “any version of that game, irrespective of by what name it is described”. Bingo must be played as an equal chance game. For game to be classed as “bingo” it must meet the Act’s definition of “equal chance gaming” (as opposed to casino gaming). Thus, it: must not involve playing or staking against a bank, and must be a game in which the chances are equally favorable to all participants in the sense that each ticket or chance has the same probability of success as any other.
Licensed bingo is a well-regulated and socially responsible form of gambling that takes place in a safe environment. Many sites offer multiple forms of bingo with different features, types of games, and costs of play. These sites often cater specifically for women and some research suggests that they may appeal to markets who would not typically engage in traditional forms of gambling.

Slots

Slot machine is one of the most beloved game among the gambling community and it has been a part of the industry for a long time. They provide fun and entertainment and their simplicity allows gamers to start playing at once. This can play out in different ways depending on the machine you’re playing. For instance, there’s Pick a Fortune, a five-reel, 20 line game that puts players right in the studio of a television game show, including the potential to play a Deal or No Deal-style bonus round. A super trend over the past few years is mobile-friendly slot games. These apps and websites were developed to enable players to enjoy their favorite games on their smartphones at any time. Another dominant slot trend is licensed branded slots that are based on popular movies, television, and musicians.
Virtual Money vs Real Money
Let’s find out the difference between social gambling and real money gambling, as well as the differences between gambling through apps and gambling through a web browser. It can be quite confusing trawling through all the casinos, slots, and lotteries available, both through your mobile web browser as well as through mobile app stores, in the form of downloadable apps.

Virtual money

The main difference between virtual money and real money gambling is that the in-game virtual currency in social games and gambling-type games is used only like credits that are not paid out as winnings or anything given to player in cash, making these games exempt from gambling regulations.
Virtual money is loaded on user game accounts via in-app purchases in mobile applications or the game balance funding from a card via web based applications.

Real money gambling

Real money gambling via your mobile device is only allowed in countries where laws have been passed that allow for this type of gambling online, or there are no laws in place that prevent it. The payment systems are the legal way of services payment in the gambling app, performing as the intermediary between the gambling facility and the client. With their help, users replenish deposits and withdraw funds to personal accounts in financial institutions. If the application uses the payment system of a well-known brand, that gives players additional confidence in the resource. Nowadays, there is a wide range of payment systems, some of which operate all over the world, other systems are oriented towards the citizens of one or several countries. A number of services accept money of different world currencies, while others allow currency transactions of one state only.
What is an Online Gambling Licensing
The internet has a global audience, there’s no single piece of legislation that covers the legality of online gambling for the entire world. Mobile gambling doesn’t typically accept customers from every single country in the world. It often focuses on certain specific regions.
Instead, most countries have their own local laws that deal with the relevant legal and regulatory issues.
Ultimately, questions of legality all go back to the location of the casino or where the website operates out of. In closed regulatory systems, such as Italy, France, and the Netherlands, licenses, and advertising rights are limited to domestic providers, which must be located within their country’s geographical boundaries and these are only permitted to offer some types of products. Some jurisdictions, for example, Norway, Sweden, and Canada legalize and regulate online gambling, but this is limited to a single site that is owned by the government. Under such an approach, the government becomes the operator and regulator and all revenues are returned to the government.
Remote gambling is generally permitted. That means that an operator that is licensed may provide gambling services to citizens in the country via all forms of remote communication (and using equipment that may be located in the country or abroad). Equally, a remote operator may be licensed to offer gambling services to citizens in any jurisdiction in the world using equipment located in the country. The law provides that, for each type of gambling (betting, gaming, and participating in a lottery), there will be two forms of license available: remote and non-remote forms (land-based). If you provide facilities for remote gambling, online or through other means, and advertise to consumers you will need a license from the licensing jurisdictions or local licensing authorities. Before an online gambling site signs up its first customer, before it accepts its first bet before the first card is dealt, it must be licensed by a recognized governmental entity.
Certain regions in the world have specific legislation in place that allows them to license and regulate companies that operate online gambling sites or provide industry services (such as the supply of gaming software). These regions are referred to as online gambling jurisdictions or licensing jurisdictions.
Depending on what type of entertainment you are going to implement in your internet establishment, you will have to apply for the corresponding permissions. Online gambling laws in Europe vary from one country to the next. The industry is well regulated in some countries and less so in others. There are several online gambling jurisdictions located in Europe. Some of these are members of the European Union (EU), and thus subject to the various rules and regulations of that body, while others are independent. Each of these jurisdictions has an authority that’s responsible for approving gambling sites for licenses that enable them to offer their services legally. They also regulate their licensees.
Countries that Provide Gambling Licensing
Today there are lots of licensing jurisdictions located all over the world and offering different terms for their customers. Depending on the country, licenses can be local, international (distributed in several countries), have a different set of documents for registration, costs of registration and further support, various operating conditions and other special details.

Which gambling license is both internationally recognized?

The government of Ireland offers casino operators, software, and service providers in the gambling industry, with a gambling license that allows gambling operators to conduct business related to casino, lotto, and other gaming-related activities. Ireland Gambling License is one of the most popular license for online casinos worldwide. Ireland has long been recognized as one of the preferred locations for Online Gambling operators to base their operations. This success has been due to a combination of factors, such as a progressive legislative system, political stability, first-rate telecommunications facilities, and a well established financial services industry. A wide range of gambling sites operates out of Ireland including sports betting, casino sites, poker, bingo, and more.
In stark contrast, the UK is the largest regulated market for online gambling in the world, and corporations are already comfortable exploiting the intersections of gambling and gaming, betting in-play, social gaming, Bitcoin, financial trading and spread betting, betting exchanges, e-sports and, most profitably, mobile gambling. 40% and 60% of online gambling in the UK took place in Gibraltar.

International licensing

Europe is home to the following online gambling jurisdictions: Alderney, Gibraltar, Isle of Man, Malta. Malta is currently the country that is most accommodating to gambling companies, and the license offers whitelisted online gambling in sports and casino games in many European territories. But takes an extreme amount of time in paperwork and background checks. Also, you pay 5% of all your gross profit to the EU.
Among countries offering gambling licensing services, the attention should be paid to Curaçao jurisdiction, which is considered to be one of the most promising for the online gaming business.
Curaçao Internet Gaming Association (also known as Curaçao eGaming) is both a regulator and a licensor, and its licensing works worldwide except Curaçao itself, USA, France and Netherlands. Using Curacao as an example, let us examine in detail the process of obtaining a license, the necessary documents and expenses.
How to get a License on Curaçao
  • Documents necessary for company registration:
  • criminal record;
  • passport scans;
  • bank account confirmation;
  • documents proving payments for utility services.
After the company is registered, an operator can apply for the license providing the following documents:
  • a document certifying the right of domain possession;
  • description of games planned to be used in the project;
  • a list indicating countries of potential operation;
  • illustration of server locations to be used in the project;
  • a copy of the agreement with a software provider.
Gambling license cost:
  • Bank account opening $1000
  • Company registration $3600
  • Company management per year $3600
  • Application processing fee $1000
  • License fee per year $4800
  • Equipment/software fee starting from $1500
  • Server maintenance per year $6000
Apart from that pay for technical support and maintenance every year. The entire license issuing process takes between 2-4 weeks. Curacao Internet Gaming Association (CIGA) also has the power to review a license and, if it finds that an operator has breached a license condition, has the power to impose a range of sanctions including revocation of the license.
Apple and Google Gambling Rules
You’ll be surprised at the limited number of real money gambling app options available on the AppStore and Google Play Store. Most real money casino gaming is done through gambler’s mobile web browsers and not through mobile gambling apps that you’ll find for iPhone and Android phones. Apple allows online gambling applications in a few forms, and not just in places where it is explicitly permitted. They do not allow any payments through the applications – those have to be done on the websites. Apple has far stricter developer guidelines for iOS apps than Google does for Android apps, so it’s fine to assume that whatever you choose to download from iTunes is usually safe, secure, and meets a certain standard.
Any real money casino in the iTunes app is required to have proper licensing and permissions before Apple will approve the app for use or downloads. While Google Play is technically regulated, it is much more loose in what can be hosted.

Apple Store

Gambling, gaming, and lotteries can be tricky to manage and tend to be one of the most-regulated offerings on the App Store. Apple has rules for apps that support real money wagering, including sports betting and poker. Those apps and lotteries must have necessary licensing and permissions in the locations where the App is used, must be geo-restricted to those locations, and must be free on the App Store, and Apple rate even simulated gambling apps as appropriate only for users 17-years-old and up.

Play Store

Google keeps the reigns tight. To be able to successfully upload apps to the Google Play store, developers need to have a valid license for the specific countries they are targeting and comply with their regulations. The app must be free to download and must prevent under-age users from gambling in the app. As a final precaution, all gambling apps are required to display prominent information regarding responsible gambling practices. This brings its policy in line with the Apple App Store.
Countries where gambling is illegal
It is also important to remember that while gambling is growing rapidly in many places, in others it is totally or partially prohibited. As well as in the majority of the US, sports betting is illegal in India, Pakistan, and China, three of the largest gambling markets in the world. Most countries have rules against gambling. Almost all Islamic countries prohibit gambling of every kind, but many turn a blind eye to online gambling or simply do not have regulations in place for this grey area.
In the United Arab Emirates, however, any kind of gambling is prosecuted. National lotteries are the only legal forms of wagering on the Asian country’s mainland. Cambodia, North Korea strictly forbids online and offline gambling amongst its own citizens but allows tourists to participate in these activities.
Qatar is the strictest country of all when it comes to gambling laws. All forms of gambling activities are considered illegal, and even sports betting is not permissible.
Starting your own gambling product
Numerous online casino platforms in the market offer fantastic casino games like bingo, poker, roulette, and many more.
If you have an idea, but don’t know where to start, we advise you begin with a Minimal Viable Product (MVP) to pilot your proof of concept for investors. MVP spotlights your core features and lets your investors know there are bigger and better things to come.
For MVP you do not need a large team, just a few people are enough to create a fully functioning prototype. In the case of successful numbers of your prototype, the further development of a full-fledged product will require more team, resources and time, however you will be sure that your development and your costs will pay off.
submitted by Fgfactory_ua to gamedev [link] [comments]

Mega-List: Israel's Crimes and Controversies

Updated on 16 Sept 2020, Arranged in Chronological Order
All articles cited are from reliable and trustworthy sources (some may be NSFL):
Use this website to read any paywalled site you might encounter in this list.
Major Incidents:
ONE. Assasination of Jacob Israël de Haan (1924), a Dutch-Jewish diplomat, for attempting to make a peace deal with the Emir of Mecca - his plan was a Palestinian state in a Jordanian federation, the Zionists would drop the Balfour declaration and any claim to a state in exchange for unrestricted immigration. He was assassinated when leaving a synagogue by Avraham Tehomi (who admitted to it much later), on the orders of Yitzhak Ben-Zvi, who later became the 2nd President of Israel:
Wiki, Haaretz, 972mag
TWO. King David Hotel Bombing (1946) where right-wing Zionist terrorists attacked a British HQ located within the hotel killing 91 and injuring 46. The leader of the perpetrators, Manachem Begin became the Prime Minister of Israel in 1977:
Wiki, Haaretz
THREE. Deir Yassin Massacre (1948) where 110 villagers were slaughtered, some members of the perpetrators were at a later time, absorbed into the IDF, one even became PM of Israel:
Wiki, Haaretz, Britannica
FOUR. Document from IDF archives (1948) which after translation states:
"In the villages lying between Nahraiya and Tarshiha there are no foreign troops for the time being.The villages are armed and ready for action1. Your orders are to occupy, kill the men2, destroy and burn down the villages of Kabri, Umm al-Faraj and al-Nahr."
[1] Ilan Pappe notes that the villagers had no proper arms, only for hunting purposes and people who served in the police; without Arab troops that were absent they stood no chance [2] In April 1948, the Intelligence of the Hagana defined men as anyone above the age of 10
Sources:
-Photo taken from IDF Archives 1676\51\12
-Benny Morris, The Birth of the Palestinian refugee problem, 1947-1949, ISBN 0-521-33028-9. P. 133
-Hagana archives, 100\35, dated May 19, 1948
FIVE. Palestinian Exodus "Nakba" (1948) was an expulsion of 700,000 Palestinian Arabs from their Homeland during the war and establishment of Israel in May 1948, these includes testimonies of massacres, rape and looting. During and immediately following the state’s creation, Israel expropriated approximately 4,244,776 acres of Palestinian land.
Haaretz, Haaretz, Atlantic, Vox, TheWallsOfJerusalem
SIX. Assassination of Folke Bernadotte, (1948) UN Mediator for Palestinian Refugees by Israel's Zionist Paramilitary Group, Lehi. The killing was approved by the three-man 'center' of Lehi, one of which, after the assassination, became 7th Prime Minister of Israel (Yitzhak Shamir). No one was convicted for the assassination:
Wiki, Independent, Haaretz, WRMEA
SEVEN. Lavon Affair (1954) a failed false flag operation where Egyptian Jews were recruited by Israeli Military Intelligence to plant bombs inside Egyptian, American, and British-owned civilian targets, their foiled plan was to blame the attacks on the Muslim Brotherhood:
Haaretz, TimesofIsrael, Wiki
EIGHT. Kafr Qasim Massacre (1956) where Israeli Border Police killed 49 Arabs (19 men, 6 women, 23 children, 1 unborn child) returning home from work during a curfew they were unaware of. Those involved in the massacre were found guilty but were pardoned and released from prison in a single year. The highest ranking official prosecuted for the massacre confessed before his death, that the massacre were planned to ethnically cleanse Israeli Arabs from the region, and that his trial was staged to protect Israeli political and military elites, including Prime Minister Ben Gurion, from taking responsibility for the massacre:
Wiki, Haaretz, 972mag, Medium
NINE. Apollo Affair (1965) an incident where 200-600 pounds of highly enriched uranium disappeared from a Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Highly suspected to have gone to Israel's Nuclear Program particularly given the visit of Rafi Eitan who was under the guise of a chemist but later revealed as an Israeli spy and who was later involved in the Jonathan Pollard incident:
Wiki, LATimes, Mondoweiss,
Archive of the findings of Roger Mattson, a Physicist who investigated the Incident for the Nuclear Regulatory Commision,
YouTube, 1968 FBI Report, FBI's Declassified Memo PDF
TEN. USS Liberty (1967) where Israel deliberately attacked an American Cargo Vessel killing 34 without any repurcussions:
YouTube, Haaretz, Wiki
ELEVEN. Sabra & Shatila massacre (1982), perpetrated by a Lebanese Christian militia (Phalangists), which was under the political and military control of Israel. For 3 days, they engaged in rape, murder and mutilation w the knowledge of IDF troops surrounding the refugee camps. Israeli forces fired flares into the night sky to illuminate the darkness for the Phalangists, allowed reinforcements to enter the area on the 2nd day of the massacre, and provided bulldozers that were used to dispose of the bodies of many victims. Estimated death count: 2000 - 3500. Ariel Sharon was held responsible for the Massacre, but he was still voted as PM of Israel in 2001:
SciencesPo, TRTworld, AJ, IMEU
TWELVE. Operation Trojan (1986) according to ex-Mossad agent in his book, Mossad instigated the US bombing of Libya by planting a transmission device and impersonating as the Libyan Govt sending terrorist orders to its embassies around the world. (Story in Page 113-117) (Downloadable PDF File):
Other Side of Deception PDF
THIRTEEN. Cave of Patriarchs Massacre (1994) Israeli Settler Baruch Goldstein opened fire in Ibrahimi Mosque, killing 29 worshippers and wounding more than 125:
Wiki, JPost
FOURTEEN. Qana Massacre (1996) IDF fired artillery shells at a UN Compound where 800 Lebanese civillians were taking refuge. 106 civillians were killed, 116 injured, 4 Fiji UN forces were also seriously injured:
Wiki, AlAraby, Independent, DailyMotion
FIFTEEN. 2nd Qana Massacre (2006) air-strike carried out by IDF on a building Lebanon during the war. 28 civillians were killed out of which 16 were children. Upon investigation, IDF concluded that there was in fact no rocket launched from Qana on the day of the deadly strike by IDF:
Wiki, BBC, Norman Finkelstein
SIXTEEN. Israeli Mossad posed as CIA agents to recruit terrorists to carry out False Flag Operations against Iran (2007-2008)
Haaretz, ForeignPolicy
SEVENTEEN. Four Iranian nuclear scientists were assassinated and another was seriously wounded in an attempted murder between (2010-2012). US officials confirm that Terror Group, MEK was financed, trained, and armed by Israel in killing the nuclear scientists:
NBC, Guardian, Guardian
Sidenote
What is Zionism?
YouTube
Palestine before Zionism (Pre-1948):
Youtube (1896)
Youtube (1900s)
Youtube (1930s)
Youtube (1946 - Arrival of Illegal Zionist Immigrants)
Divide & Conquer: An interactive map explaining the Israel divide and control of Palestinian Land (2019):
Interactive Map
JIDF: Israeli Government is paying and giving away scholarships to students who fight internet battles and spread propaganda (2013):
BBC, USAToday, Huffington Post
Israel's JIDF Hasbara App (2017):
YouTube
App on GooglePlay where people defend Israel on Social Platforms to gain points (2019):
GooglePlay
Intl Law:
Apartheid Against Palestinians:
Protected Wiki
International Law (Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, UN Resolution 37/43) dictates that Palestinians have a legal right to an armed struggle to resist occupation:
Add. Protocol I, Geneva Conventions (PDF), UN Resolution 37/43 (PDF)
Israel's building of settlements in occupied territories such as the West Bank and East Jerusalem are illegal under international law, violating Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 as well as the Statute of Rome, Art. 8 (2)(b)(viii) which states: "The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.":
Wiki, UN, International Law on Occupation, Al Jazeera, Amnesty, Amnesty, B'Tselem, YouTube
Israel's destruction of homes in occupied territories such as the West Bank and East Jerusalem are illegal under international law, violating Article 53 of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 which states: "Any destruction by the Occupying Power of real or personal property belonging individually or collectively to private persons ... is prohibited, except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary by military operations.":
Fourth Geneva Convention (PDF)
Others:
Israeli former nuclear technician turned whistleblower was lured to Italy where Mossad drugged and abducted him back to Israel for the trial that was held secretly behind closed doors. He spent 18 years in prison, including more than 11 in solitary confinement. Says he suffered "cruel and barbaric treatment" at the hands of Israeli authorities while imprisoned because he was Christian. After his release in 2004, he was subjected to a broad array of very strict restrictions on his speech and movement (1986):
Wiki, Youtube, NYT, Guardian, CNN, Wired, Telegraph
2nd Intifada, 12 yr old boy shot dead, father severely injured (2000):
CNN, Twitter
Breaking the silence - targeting civilians with grenades and machine guns during the 2nd Intifada (2000):
YouTube
5 Israelis working for an Israeli Company "Urban Moving Systems" were arrested on 9/11 after being seen photographing and celebrating the attack on the WTC. Owner of the company fled to Israel after the incident. FBI still lists him as a 9/11 suspect but Israel refuses to extradiate him (2001):
9/11 War by Deception, YouTube, Forward, NYT, Haaretz
Netanyahu caught on tape: "America is something that you can easily maneuver and move in the right direction" (2001):
YouTube
Netanyahu lying during his speech at the US House of Representatives on Saddam Hussiens WMDs which doesn't exist (2002):
YouTube
Advocating racial purity in Israel, Chinese workers in Israel sign no-sex contract (2003)
Guardian
Tom Hurndall, a British Peace Activist, was shot in the head by an IDF sniper while he was helping Palestinian children flee from cross-fire in Rafah, Gaza strip. His killer was released from prison 2 years early of his 8-year sentence (2003):
Wiki, BBC, Guardian, Evening Standard
Rachel Corrie, American Activist who was run over by an Israeli bulldozer destroying Palestinian homes in Gaza (2003):
Imgur, BBC
New Zealand imposed diplomatic sanctions on Israel over an incident where 2 Australia-based Israelis, who were allegedly working for Mossad, attempted to fraudulently obtain NZ Passports by claiming the identity of a disabled man. 2 others, Ze'ev Barkan and David Reznick, are believed to have been the 3rd and 4th men involved in the scandal but they managed to leave NZ before being apprehended. NZ PM viewed the incident as "not only utterly unacceptable but also a breach of NZ's sovereignty and international law". The following year, Israeli foreign minister apologized for the incident. (2004)
Wiki, NZHerald
Breaking the Silence, testimonies from IDF Whistleblowers (2004):
BreakingTheSilence
Not guilty, IDF Captain who empties his magazine on a 13yr old girl, says he would have done the same if she was 3 yrs old (2005):
Guardian
Phosphorus and cluster bombs which is illegal under international law heavily used by Israel during the Lebanon war (2006)
Haaretz
Israel celebrates Irgun Hotel Bombing (2006):
Telegraph
Former Israeli Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben Ami: “If I were a Palestinian, I Would Have Rejected Camp David” implying that the Camp David Summit Offer by Ehud Barak in 2000 was unreasonable and designed to be rejected (2006):
DemocracyNow
Jewish National Fund (a charity) owns 13% of the land in Israel and stipulates that only Jews can buy, mortgage or lease their land. (2007):
Economist, Wiki
Operation 'Cast Lead', estimated 1391 Palestinians killed, 759 to be civillians, 344 children, 110 women 13 Israeli killed, out of which 10 are soldiers (2008-2009):
BBC, Haaretz, Haaretz, Amnesty
Israel admits using White Phosphorus during their military offensive on Gaza (2009):
France24
Palestinian who claimed to be a Jew after a consensual sexual encounter with an Israeli woman jailed for 'Rape By Deception' (2010)
[ABCnews](https://abcnews.go.com/International/palestinian-claimed-jew-jailed-rape-deceptio
Israeli Organization, Kav La Oved: "Israel owes billions of shekels to Palestinian workers" (2010) (Downloadable PDF File):
KavLaOved PDF
Using Palestinian captives as human shields (2010):
Imgur, Guardian, Haaretz, Haaretz
Gaza Flotilla, Israeli Commandos raid 6 civillians ships carrying humanitarian aid and construction materials, 9 activists were killed, 10 Israeli commandos wounded (2010):
Guardian, CNN
Hashomer, Haganah, Irgun and Lehi which operated against the British Government and Arabs in Palestine used to hide weapons in synagogues, women's rooms and kindergartens. Something Israel criticises Hamas of doing today. (2011):
Haaretz
IDF soldier caught kicking a Palestinian child (2012):
RT
Hierarchy of the Human species according to Eli Ben-Dahan, Israel's former deputy minister of defense: Goyims (Non-Jews) placed below Homosexual Jews (2013):
Haaretz
Israeli Trade Minister: "I've killed alot of Arabs in my life, there's no problem with that" (2013)
JPost
IDF soldier posting an Instagram pic of a Palestinian clild in his rifle crosshairs (2013):
Guardian
Ethiopian Jews injected with contraceptive birth control without their consent (2013):
Haaretz, Independent, Guardian
In 2013, Israel awarded 'Genie Energy', an American Oil and Gas company, rights to drill in Golan Heights (Syrian territory occupied by Israel) despite international opposition. In 2015, Israel claimed a massive discovery of oil in the area, which Israeli officials reportedly believe could supply the country’s oil needs for many years to come. (2013):
Here are the prominent figures in Genie Energy's Board of Advisors:
Jacob Rothschild (British banker of the prominent Rothschild family), Dick Cheney (Ex-Vice president of USA), Rupert Murdoch (Billionaire American Media Mogul), James Woolsey (Ex-CIA Director), Lawrence Summers (Ex-Head of US Treasury), Bill Richardson (Ex-Energy Secretary of USA), Michael Steinhardt (Wall Street Trader, Investor and Hedge Fund Manager)
BusinessInsider, TRTworld, Yahoo Finance
4 boys playing soccer in an open beach bombed by an Israeli warship, a later report in 2018 then revealed that it was two missiles fired from an Israeli armed drone that actually killed the boys (2014):
NYT, Intercept, Haaretz, Independent
Israeli police officers beats up a 15yr old American boy a week after the boy's cousin was killed, no jail time was given to the officers (2014):
BBC, TimesofIsrael
Palestinian boy beaten and burned alive by Israeli settlers (2014):
Guardian, Wiki
Israelis cheering on the Gaza bombing (2014):
Guardian
Statistics of Palestinian children killed in Operation 'Protective Edge' (2014):
Telegraph
Avraham Shalom (Former Head of Shin Bet) compares Israel's Occupation to Nazi Germany's actions in WW2 towards the Czechs, Poles and Dutch (2014):
YouTube
Killing Gaza: Documentary on war crimes committed by the Israeli Military, with direct testimonies and evidence from survivors (2014):
KillingGaza
IDF beating up a Palestinian man who told them to stop firing tear gas (2015):
YouTube
Eli Ben-Dahan, Israel's former deputy defense minister: "Homosexual Jews are superior to Gentiles (Non-Jews), a jew always has a higher soul than a gentile, even if he is a homosexual" He also says "To me, they (Palestinians) are like animals, they aren't human" (2015):
TimesofIsrael
Israeli Foreign Minister says disloyal Arabs should be beheaded with an axe (2015):
WashingtonPost
Israeli Radicals celebrate by stabbing picture of Palestinian baby that was killed in a firebomb attack (2015):
Haaretz
Beitar Jerusalem, the most racist football fanbase in the world (2015):
YouTube
IDF Soldier assaults and beats up Palestinian Shopkeeper as he was loading boxes (2015):
YouTube
Former IDF Soldier Ido Gal Razon testifies to murdering people in Gaza (2015):
YouTube
Israeli racist police officer assaults their own african soldier (2015):
YouTube
Shir Hever, Israeli Economist: "78% of Palestinian aid money ends up going to Israel" (2015) (Downloadable PDF File):
ShirHever PDF
Brooke Goldstein (Director of the Lawfare Project who has assisted in many lawsuits towards Palestinian activist groups) declared to enthusiastic applause at a meeting of key Israel lobby operatives in New York: “Why are we using the word Palestinian? There’s no such thing as a Palestinian person” (2016)
Video
Many Palestinians including children are detained in Israeli prisons without trial or charges (2016):
Time, Haaretz, 972mag, B'Tselem
Jewish Community Watch: "Israel becoming a safe haven for paedophiles worldwide" (2016):
Independent
IDF Soldier throws disabled man out of his wheelchair after he attempts to help a 14yr old who was shot (2016):
Independent
IDF throws stun grenade at unarmed Palestinians talking outside their home (2016)
YouTube
IDF soldier laughs as Palestinian man is crushed at the gate (2016):
YouTube
IDF killing a 15yr old Palestinian travelling home from a family outing (2016):
Guardian
Report: Israel's repetitive destruction of EU-funded projects in Palestine (2016):
EuroMed
Former Director of Mossad defends Israel providing aid to Al-Nusra Front (Al-Qaeda's Affiliate) in Syria (2016)
Youtube, WSJ, Haaretz
Israeli Former Defence Minister says ISIS fighters apologizes to Israel after mistakenly launching an attack on IDF. Refused to comment on how they expressed their apology. Have since forgiven ISIS (2017)
Independent, DailySabah
Reports of Torture during custody from Palestinians held imprisoned without charges or trial (2017):
Haaretz
IDF Veteran: "I was the terrorist" (2017):
YouTube
Israel seizes solar panels donated to Palestinians by the Dutch govt (2017):
Independent
Israelis speak candidly about Palestinians to Abby Martin, includes lots of racism (2017):
YouTube
Gaza: World's Largest Open-Air Prison (2018):
NRC
Sentence to 9 Months after killing 2 unarmed Palestinian teens (2018):
972mag, WashingtonPost
Unarmed protestor holding flag shot by live bullets (2018):
YouTube
Unarmed protester shot in the head during the protest (2018):
Gyfcat
IDF assaulting medics and injured protesters (2018):
Gyfcat
Abdullah Shamali, was shot while standing and talking with his friends 700 metres away from the fence (2018):
Twitter
Muhammad Ayoub, 15yr old was shot in the head while running away from the fence (2018):
YouTube
Mentally disabled man shot in the back of his head as he was walking away (2018):
Haaretz
Elderly man waving a flag and a medic got shot at by a live round (2018):
Gyfcat
Shot dead for waving flag (2018):
EgyptToday
Medic shot dead by an IDF sniper (2018):
WashingtonPost
IDF edits video of Palestinian Medic who was shot dead by them to misleadingly show that she was a human shield for Hamas and justify her death (2018):
Independent, BuzzFeed
Canadian Doctor shot by IDF sniper (2018):
CBC
Israeli Border police throws stun grenade at a Palestian couple and their infant baby as they were fleeing (2018):
YnetNews
IDF Snipers cheering as they shoot an unarmed Palestinian (2018):
Guardian
Similar incident, cheering after shooting a Palestinian (2018):
Guardian
"Nation State" Law gives Jews exclusive rights over Arabs living in Israel (2018):
Guardian
List of active discriminatory laws in Israel:
Adalah
Did you know that 97% of drinking water in Gaza (under Israeli control) is contaminated? (2018):
Haaretz
IDF Soldiers shooting tear gas into a Palestinian school (2018):
Haaretz
Israeli settlers beating up Palestinian farmer in front of his children (2018):
Haaretz
Former Chairman of Israel Labour Party says relationships between Jews and Non-Jews are "an actual plague" (2018):
Twitter
4 year old child dies 4 days after being shot by the IDF while protesting (2018):
Reuters, PressTV
An alternative view, Palestinian Christians on Israel (2018):
Youtube
Chief Rabbi calls black people "monkeys" in his weekly sermon (2018):
TimesofIsrael
Israel's Supreme Court rejects legal challenge on the military's rule where soldiers can fire on UNARMED protesters (2018):
APNews
Mohammed Tamimi, 16, who was shot in the head by Israeli forces held in prison for 2 days without explanation (2018):
Haaretz, Haaretz
Most demonstrators shot by the IDF with live rounds are unarmed and not in immediate vicinity of the perimeter fence (2018):
B'Tselem
IDF edited out key footage of Gaza missile strike which killed 2 Palestinian teenagers (2018):
Youtube, 972mag, B'Tselem
Multi Award-winning short documentary on the occupation of Gaza (2018):
YouTube
What if your whole family was being forcefully evicted from a home you lived in since 1948 to make way for new settlers? (2019)
Haaretz
Palestinian Boy on the way to school shot in the head by Israeli Police (2019):
Haaretz
Video of war crimes screened at UN Human Rights Council (2019):
Youtube
Top Rabbis in Israel defending and calling for donations to an Israeli charged with killing a Palestinian woman (2019):
Haaretz, Haaretz
PART 2, 3, 4 & 5 CONTINUED IN COMMENT SECTION BELOW
submitted by invalidusermyass to list_palestine [link] [comments]

I call Bullshit on the False rape accusation sticky from Mens Lib sub. Actual lies are being told.

Fact Checking False Rape Accusations and Why We Shouldn't Fear a False Rape Epidemic.
📷
One of the main resistance to changes in how police and society handle Rape, Sexual Assault and even Harassment is the counter argument that men then would be plagued by False Rape accusations. The fear is always that we crossed some line that no longer allows reasonable doubt and that one man life can be sent to jail by one accusation. We of course have seen stories of such things in the news and everytime we question wither these are isolated stories or a sign of a larger epidemic we don't get to see. When does the drive of combating rape go to far? Is it an issue to fear?
So how common is this issue? Is it really a threat to men? How many false rape accusations are there?
How Many False Rape Accusations are there?
Most experts agree that false rape accusations make the total of 2-10% of the total accusations of rape. As quoted from the handbook
A multi-site study of eight U.S. communities including 2,059 cases of sexual assault found a 7.1% of false reports (Lonsway, Archambault, & Lisak, 2009).
Link to it here http://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1238871)/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1238871)
A study of 136 sexual assault cases in Boston from 1998-2007 found a 5.9% of false reports (Lisak et al., 2010).
Using qualitative and quantitative analysis, researchers studied 812 reports of sexual assault from 2000-2003 and found a 2.1% of false reports (Heenan & Murray 2006).
And why not add some more papers to the mix.
2017 Study into the FBI Database found that between 2006 to 2010 the Average number of false rape accusations or baseless accusations was 5.55%, and robbery had a higher false and baseless accusation rate of 5.76%
Another metastudy by Claire E. Ferguson, and John M. Malouff published in December 17th, 2015 put the number of False Rape Accusations at 5%

So keep in mind that ALL of these numbers are minimums. These all represent the number of false rape accusations made to the police that provably false using rigorous standards.

And while it may be small, the 2-10% is actually 2-11%. They round that 2.3% number down to 2% so it's only fair to round the 10.9% up to 11%. You can either say 2.3%-10.9% or you can say 2-11%. It's a small thing but it irks me.

But all of these numbers are minimums. Just like when 3-5% of cases end up with convictions. That means a minimum of 3-5% of rape cases taken to the police are true. A MINIMUM.
This three minute youtube sums it up very well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8zSDvaYrRw&list=LLIiza3uxnPBzZKoXthGOenQ&index=9&t=0s


Now I know that 2-10% is alot and enough to give anyone pause considering how epidemic sexual assault is. But consider a few things.
1 in 6 of women report they have been sexually assaulted.

If you check the link it takes you to Rainn. The 1 in 6 women will be rape in their lifetime comes from where? I checked the footnote. Oh it's from...
National Institute of Justice & Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Prevalence, Incidence and Consequences of Violence Against Women Survey
This is the precursor to the CDC NISVS survey. Guess what the CDC NISVS survey also found? It found that for years of 2010-2012 female-perpetrated "made to penetrate" sexual assault on men, (rape, for lack of a better word,) was at parity with male perpetrated rape for these years. Let that sink in for a minute.
When you are done letting that sink in, ask yourself why a sub called menslib is not mentioning that in 2012 there were over 1.5 million instances of female-on-male rapes according to the CDC NISVS survey in 2012? (Although they don't call it that, but prefer the more awkward, "made to penetrate" sexual assault) '
This links to the CDC NISVS survey data so you can check for yourself. The lifetime stats are much lower than the year over year and despite my inquiries to the CDC I have not gotten an answer as for why that is. However, for each year of 2010, 2011, and 2012 we find parity between the sexes for sexual assault/rape perpetration. Look at the 12 month data.

This blog does a very good job of breaking this down:
https://recalculatingthegenderwar.tumblr.com/post/162336650896/new-cdc-data-again-finds-as-many-if-not-more

Only a 1/3rd of sexual assaults are reported to police. So at its 2-10% of 33%
This statistic covers if or not an accusation is false, wither or not a specific suspect is named which I will show below is a more interesting stat. The majority of false rape accusations are made against non existent strangers the victims claim they don't know.

This is a nice rabbit pulled out of the hat. Why are we assuming that all of the sexual assaults not reported to the police are true? I for one have been the collateral damage victim of a false/baseless rape accusation made on social media. Ostensibly, rape accusations that are not taken to the police and are merely posted on Twitter, Facebook, or added a circulating anonymous rapist list, or made at a bar, or something... are MORE likely to be false. Not less. Yet this author would have you believe that they are all 100% true. Magic!
Of course there are many rapes that happen that are never taken to the police. For example, the 1,5 million incidents of female on male "made to penetrate" rape that I mentioned above. Almost none of these are reported. Less than 1 percent. These male victims of female perpetrators are hidden by systemic cultural bias.

Soo how many false rape allegations lead to false arrests and convictions then?
How many people Falsely Accused of Rape actually go to Jail?
Thankfully we found that the answer is very low.
National Registry of Exoneration who keeps track of how many innocent people have been... well... exonerated found that since 1989 in the US 52 people have been exonerated for sexual assault that they didn't do. People exonerated on false accusations of Murder was 790 people.
Note: Innocent Project has listed 276 exonerated with Sex Crimes, this is the highest number I can find. Thanks MealReadytoEat_
British Home Office did a detailed study and report on the issues of false rape accusations in 2005 and found that out of the 216 cases of rape that was false in the UK, 126 of them have a formal complain filed by the accuser, 39 of them had a named suspect and only 6 of them were arrested. Out of the 6 arrested only 2 have charges and 0 of them had a conviction.
Another Study by the University of Pittsburgh found that only 18% of False Rape Accusastions name a suspect

Nevermind the fact in 1996 the FBI backtested over 25,000 rapekits and found that 1 in 4 excluded the primary suspect, in almost all cases, as fingered by the primary witness/alleged victim.
https://www.ncjrs.gov/txtfiles/dnaevid.txt
Conducted in June 1995, the nationwide telephone survey of 40 public and private laboratories that performed DNA tests sought answers to such questions as: From the time the laboratories began DNA testing, how many cases have they handled? Of that number, what percentage yielded results that excluded defendants as sources of the DNA evidence or were inconclusive?
The 40 surveyed laboratories yielded 19 whose available data were sufficient for the purposes of this study. The 19 included 13 at the State/local level, 4 in the private sector, an armed forces laboratory, and the FBI's laboratory.
Most of the laboratories had initiated DNA testing only within the previous few years. Twelve began testing between 1990 and 1992. Three of the four private laboratories began in 1986 or 1987, while the FBI started DNA testing in 1988.
Seven of the laboratories reported using RFLP testing; four, PCR testing; and eight, both types of tests. The 19 laboratories reported that, since they began testing, they had received evidence in 21,621 cases for DNA analysis, with the FBI accounting for 10,060 cases. Three of the 4 private laboratories averaged 2,400 each; the State and local laboratories averaged 331 each.
In about 23 percent of the 21,621 cases, DNA test results excluded suspects, according to respondents. An additional 16 percent of the cases, approximately, yielded inconclusive results, often because the test samples had deteriorated or were too small. Inconclusive results aside, test results in the balance of the cases did not exclude the suspect.
The FBI reported that, in the 10,060 cases it received, DNA testing results were about 20 percent inconclusive and 20 percent exclusion; the other 18 laboratories (11,561 cases) reported about 13 percent and 26 percent, respectively.\*
Unfortunately, the laboratories were unable to provide more details. They did not maintain data bases that would permit categorization of DNA test results by type of offense and other criteria. What happened to the suspects who were excluded through DNA testing also cannot be determined. Were they released, or were they charged on the basis of other evidence, for example? Thus, only the most general information is known about the results of DNA testing by laboratories. To obtain more detailed information would require a comprehensive research project.
That's hard forensic data that puts the ballpark figure of false rape accusation at about 1 in 4. Now to be fair, some of these may have been genuine mistaken identity. But if you are the man under arrest by the police accused of rape, you would call that a false rape accusation.


Fact is that the majority of false rape accusations don't even name a suspect. And throwing this into the picture of the total of the numbers of rape really proves how rare false rape Convictions are. Vast majority of false rape accusers always accuse a non existent stranger who raped them and usually not someone specifically. Which means that beyond wasting time and resources majority of false rape accusations are harmless to the general public because no one person is accused.
When you take these studies and add them to what we already know about rape a more complete picture forms:
1/6 women claim to have experience sexual assault, follow by a 1/3 reporting the assault to police, then worst case scenario 1/10 are false. Out of those false rape accusations 9/50 name a suspect, out of false rape accusations that accuse someone 15/100 get an arrest and, out of those who are arrested for a rape they didn't do only 1/3 have charges placed against them.

This is so wrong as to be a lie. Remember, according to Dr. Lisak's metastudy, a minimum of 2-11 percent of all rape accusations taken to the police are PROVEN to be false.

So 1/6 x 1/3 x 1/10 x 9/50 x 15/100 x 1/3 = 0.00005
Which mean out of all the women you meet you have a 0.005% chance of being falsely charged of Rape.
A blood vessel in my frontal lobe just exploded. I can't even begin to understand what the heck he is doing with the numbers here. Can anyone help me out with this. Like I have a headache just from trying.

Compare this to the fact that 6.4% of men openly admitted of committing the strictest possible definition of rape and 23% of that 6.4% admitted of multiple rapes.

This link is dead. But let's look at a couple other studies that look at the number of people openly admitting to committing rape.
Hogben, Byrne & Hamburger (1996) Lifetime prevalence of 24% for women having made a man engage in sexual activity against his will
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J056v08n01_05
Sexually Aggressive Women Anderson, Struckman-Johnson 1999 – 43% of college women admitted to using verbal or physical pressure to obtain sex (No ebook available. I've ordered a print copy in the mail but it won't arrive for another week.)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6245084/
I'm just saying, there is one half of the equation being left out here. It is likely the smaller half. But why are we still pretending in 2019 like it doesn't happen? It happens all the time. Go check out teacherswhorape for a daily update of female pedophiles.


Why False Rape Accusations happen?
Many people who fear False Rape Accusations claim that women in the work force will make a False Accusation against a man in a higher position, or a student who is going to fail an exam will accuse a professor, or rape or that a vengeful ex, or a woman who regretted sex later.
But the realities of this is very surprising.
According to a review done by the LAPD found the reasons for a False Rape accusations is unwanted pregnancies or more commonly "Missed Curfews" by young teenagers. It turns out that 55% of False Rape Accusations according to this review are for hope of getting medical care or psychiatric medication by the very poor and destitute
Also it is noted that half of the False Rape Accusations are made by Parents of children. Either by pressuring the child to go to the police or accusing someone of rape without the child knowing. It is also important to note that the rare Serial False Rape Accusers tend to have a history of being a legitimate victim Sexual Abuse as a child.
As this shows that the False Accuser the majority of the time aren't the serial accusers we hear on the media nor are in tech jobs, nor college students who regret sex. Instead it is usually either the very poor looking for free medication, teenagers trying to get out of trouble and parents of children who make the vast majority of False Rape Accusations.
Also there are no corolations with the age of the accusation or the number of sexual partners of the accuser and wither their accusations are true or not. Add this to the fact that most legitimate victims lie to themselves and others saying that they weren't sexually assaulted when they really were. This denial often is due to the fact that the majority of victims know their abusers personally before the assault and often change their stories or denied that they were as a way to cope the trauma. I can personally attest to that.
Special thanks to ILikeNeurons

Why does he leave out De Zutter(2017)? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313830325_Motives_for_Filing_a_False_Allegation_of_Rape
Reasons for a false rape accusation:

'Don't know'

According to De Zutter et al. (2017), 20% of complainants said that they did not know why they had filed a false allegation.[8]

While we are at it, wikipedia also lists false memories as a reason for a false rape accusation.

False memories[edit]

There are several ways in which an alleged victim can accidentally come to believe that they have been raped by the person(s) they accuse. These include, but are not limited to:[7]

Let's not forget that in the UK, "alleged" rape victims are paid in cash regardless of whether the accused is found guilty or not.
Jemma Beale collected 11,000 pounds before being caught. That's a hell of a side gig. falsely accused nine men of raping her on separate occasions, while a further six had supposedly sexually assaulted her.
https://thewarrzone.blogspot.com/2019/03/the-hard-lessons-of-jemma-beale.html
She is unique in that she is one of the rare false rape accusers to be prosecuted.


Why didn't you include those other "Studies"?
Since I am from the future I know this will be bring up sooo I will nip it in the butt before it shows up in the comments. And if they still show up without talking about this section of my effort post you have my permission to shame them.
Small thing, but the saying is "nip in the bud." Like a plant. Shame is how feminism works, right? They shame people into submission. Like #metoo. If you stand up to a false rape accusation they shame you as a RAPE APOLOGIST.

People who fear the False Accusation "Epidemic" that is supposedly happening like to point to the "other studies" on these issues. What are these other "studies" and why don't I use them in my analysts? Well because they are bad. Flat out bad or rely on a misconception of the nature of sexual assault. And there are alot of them. Lets take sample out of the list Wikipedia provided.

Also these studies expose a much larger issue when it comes to research into sexual assault.... What is Sexual Assault and what is False Sexual Assault. When you look at studies the older ones tend to have uhhhhhh questionable views of what is and isn't sexual assault.
I would say the same argument could be flipped on the new definitions of rape coming our of Academic feminism.

Then if you look at other higher studies like Kanin and Jordan you figure out that they are working on the police definitions of False or Not. Unfortunately that means that they consider a story false if the victim:
Failed a Polygraph Click here if you wanna know why the Polygraph is ^^^bullshit
If the victim delayed reporting their rape
If the victim was "Intellectually Impaired"
If the victim has signs of mental illness
If the victim was intoxicated
If the victim withdraw the complaint
And if the victim was determined by police to be a "Slut"


There are criticism to make of Kanin. Small sample size, sure. Undisclosed location, also iffy. But according to Kanin, the police only classified an accusation as false if the alleged victim confessed to it being false AND they were able to corroborate the new story with the defendant and other witnesses. It did involve a serious, but not mandatory, offer of a polygraph test. But the offer of the polygraph test was merely a catalyst. An accusation was on classified as false if the alleged victim herself recanted. In 41% of the cases, the alleged victim did so.
There are legitimate concerns about this study I listed above. But the author has told another lie. No accusation was regarded as false at any time because of a failed polygraph or for any of the above listed reasons. I'll have to read the Jordan study because the author definitely lied about Kanin so I can assume he probably lied about Jordan as well. In fact, I completely distrust this guy.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01541619

While false complaints do occur, approximately three-quarters of the incidents concluded by the police to be false appeared to have been judged to some extent at least on the basis of stereotypes regarding the complainant’s behavior, attitude, demeanor or possible motive. Suspicious file comments were made by the detectives regarding a woman who laughed while being interviewed, others who were seen as ‘attention seeking,’ and some who were said to be ‘crying rape’ for revenge or guilt motives.
Attention seeking, Revenge, and guilt are all common and legitimate motivation for a false rape accusation according to self confessed accounts accumulated by De Zutter 2017. See above.

That's right. 75% of False Rape Accusations labeled as such by police were not because they were proven false but on the gut feelings of the police. Which means we get plenty of false false rape accusations. This is probably a bigger issue then men being falsely accused of Rape. There have been plenty of documented cases of police pressuring victims to sign false confessions claiming they made up their sexual assaults. Its why one of the major reasons why out of 1000 rapes only 6 rapists will go to jail while for robberies 20 will go to jail and 33 of assault and battery.
Using Fear as a WeaponWhy do we talk about False Rape Allegations all the time, and how its used as a political weapon.
The police deal with the shittiest people of society all day every day. You are allowed to be skeptical of the police. You are not allowed to completely write them off. I call bullshit. It might not be as high as 75% but it's high. In the UK false rape accusations are so common that police now demand that "alleged" victims hand over their phones when making an accusation that can check to see if they texted the accused the following morning something like, "Thank you for the great sex last night."

Though most rational people don't see this as such a major issues within far conservatism and the Manosphere you tend to see false accusations be pushed as the major issue against men. In fact I decided to do my own study where I went to MenRights typed it "Rape" and look at the 102 top posts by menrights on the subject. I only accepted posts of two categories, male victims of sexual assault and stories on false rape accusations. As expected MenRights had more posts about false rape then male victims of rape.
Stop kidding yourself. False rape accusations are a HUGE concern for men. Innocence is no defense against a rape accusation. Your life, your reputation, your friends, you family, your career, your honor, your legacy are all permanently and irrevocably damaged by a false rape accusation. It's shameful.

As you can see despite the fact that men are 1 in 33 in odds of being raped, that 1 in 10 rape victims are male, and as stated before only 0.005% of rape accusations lead to a man being arrested as stated above. MRAs post more about and care more about false rape accusations then male victims of sexual assault. Why is that? Why do we even talk about false rape so much if its more rare than males being raped? I get a suspicion that plenty who champion this cause are arguing disingenuously.
Interesting that he mentions a man being arrested but how come so few women are arrest for rape even though there are multiple studies going back to the 1980s indicating it's massively underreported.

False Rape accusations are not RARE. They are AT LEAST 2-11 percent of all rape accusations taken to the police. I'd bet that number is much higher since the #metoo movement when every single sociopathic liar KNOWS that they will be #believed. Oftentimes in spite of evidence.

False Accusations are rampant enough that only segregation can solve it
Yeaaaa... This covers harassment as well. Plenty of people have been using the fear of false rape accusations against men as proof that women should be "isolated". They also openly brag to each other that they "won't hire more qualified women because I am too scared of a lawsuit". As stated before the case of someone falsely accusing someone else in the workplace environment is ultra rare as most false rapes come from children or the homeless, and the vast majority don't name suspects. If anything men should be worried about sexual harassment from coworkers as it is way more statistically likely that men will be a victim of sexual harassment then falsely accuse of harassment themselves.
Choose one.
Adopt a #Believewomen policy and eliminated due process for men in the workplace.
Or demand that women be hired at equal rates as men.

False Rape Accusers should get same length sentence as Rapists
This is a common cry for those within the MRA movement is that these false accusers are getting off to easy. That they ruin countless men lives and only get slap of the wrists. But that shows a great error in their thinking is the trust that the criminal justice system gives just punishments to rapists in the first place. If we are going to punish false accusers the same way that we do punish rapists then false accusers should get:
10 Years of probation
3 Months of Jail
5 Years of probation

Instead of listing three anecdotes, how about some actual data?
"Prison sentences for rape are not uniform. A study made by the U.S. Department of Justice of prison releases in 1992, involving about 80 percent of the prison population, found that the average sentence for convicted rapists was 9.8 years, while the actual time served was 5.4 years. "
But just for fun, let's look at three false rape accusations that resulted in jail time:
Colo. man imprisoned for 28 years after woman dreamed he raped her expected to be freed after convicted rapist admits to crime,
https://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/new-trial-man-jailed-28-years-dream-rape-claim-article-1.2469667
Accused Of Florida Rape 70 Years Ago, 4 Black Men Get Posthumous Pardons
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/11/684540515/accused-of-florida-rape-70-years-ago-4-black-men-get-posthumous-pardons
Lest we forget Emmett Till
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmett_Till


That of course doesn't count the countless who have sexually assaulted and get away with it. If MRAs called for this guideline I can't help to feel they would be even more disappointed in the sentencing expecting 20 years but IRL only getting a few months. If we treated false rape accusers the same as rapists then we as a society wouldn't take them that seriously.
For both men and for women. Countless women who have sexually assaulted and gotten away with it.

Also I want to quickly address the other MRAs call for those who have been falsely accused to be placed on the Sex Offender Registry Lists. Uuuuuuuhhh What?!? This is improper use of such a list number 1, and 2 that publicly available list would then create a public list of people you can rape without repercussions. Think about it. If you publicly branded people as "False Rape Accuser" then which people would rapists target?

I'm actually opposed to the Sex Offender Registry Lists as they currently stand in our country. Female Pedophiles are very often offered a plea deal to stay off the registry.


Putting extra laws and punishments on this mush smaller issue of False Rape Accusations put more pressure on legitimate victims of sexual assault. Under the existing law there are cases of legit victims being classified by police as false victims. If you add additional punishment then we will punish legitimate victims of rape 20 years in prison for just reporting their rape and police not believing in them. And that will have a chilling effect on the rest of victims of sexual assault out there. Its hard enough as is, but if you are unable to prove it and you "act like a slut" then you could face jail time
This is just as true for rape victims. The UK is seeing an influx of innocent men convicted of rape because of horrible #believewomen policies. It is an actual nightmare.
I think false rape accusations need to be rigorously prosecuted when there is substantial evidence of malicious intent. Just because the defendant is not convicted doesn't mean it was a false rape accusation. But in many cases, there is evidence of clear malicious intent, yet the false accuser is not punished, "lest we discourage others from coming forward." (Other false accusers?)
https://metro.co.uk/2017/09/27/man-cleared-of-rape-after-victim-said-ill-ring-police-tomorrow-its-going-to-be-fun-6958964/amp/?ito=article.amp.share.top.twitter&__twitter_impression=true

Also check out falserapeaccusations


Conclusion

That's why MenRights and Reddit as a whole under reports on male victims of rape. Because admitting that rape of men is a common thing only helps prove that rape in general is a very common affair and that the 1 in 6 statistic was right the whole time. That Rape is a real problem in western society and forces them to stop ignoring it.

Multiple written lies have been told by the author of this post. When it was first posted, a great many redditors pointed out how poorly his math was put together. Instead of changing or editing his post, he merely deleted the comments. That is called suppression of the truth and it makes you a bad person.

No one is denying that rape is a serious issue. The good news is that according to the BOJ, rape, along with other violent crimes has been dropping steadily since the 1960s. In 2012 the number pivoted because for the first time in USA history, the FBI legally acknowledged that men can be raped. Unfortunately it has been worded such that female on male "made to penetrate" sexual assault is still not rape. Women can only rape men if they anally penetrate them. We still have a long way to go for true gender equality.

So remember this TL;DR when you think about False Rape Accusations.
TL;DR
For both genders you are way more likely to be raped then falsely accused of rape.
Nobody actually knows how likely you are to be falsely accused of rape. At a minimum, 2-11 percent of rape accusations made to the police are false. Probably the number is closer to 1 in 4 due to hard forensic evidence of backtested rapekits that excluded the primary suspect, (as fingered by the alleged victim,) 23% of the time. But we don't really know. It's probably safe to say that you are more at risk of being false accused of rape in 2019 than at any other time in human history because of the public demonstrations of #believewomen. Many still believe Ford's accusations against Kavanugh despite being thoroughly discredited by Leland Keyser. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/just-didnt-make-any-sense-leland-keyser-now-challenges-story-of-kavanaugh-accuser-christine-blasey-ford
" I don’t have any confidence in the story,” Keyser told New York Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly
"Those facts together I don't recollect, and it just didn't make any sense," Keyser told the authors.
"It would be impossible for me to be the only girl at a get-together with three guys, have her leave, and then not figure out how she's getting home," Keyser told Pogrebin and Kelly. "I just really didn't have confidence in the story."
A few days before the hearing, Keyser’s attorney said, “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.”
"Keyser later said she felt pressure by both [Ford classmate Lucy] Gonella and Ford's friend Monica McLean to change her story," Pogrebin and Kelly wrote.
"I was told behind the scenes that certain things could spread about me if I didn't comply," Keyser told the authors.

#metoo has already been politically weaponized. This is ridiculous. WE are being gaslighted. This is bullshit.

The estimated number of false rape accusations are around 2-10% at the highest.
This is a lie on several levels. It's 2-11%. And that is a minimum. And that's if you only consider surveys conducted by feminists or women's advocates.

For 216 False Rape Accusations only 39 named suspects, and only 2 got charged. That means that only 18% of False Rape Accusations actually accuse someone and that only 0.9% of false rape accusations ended up on court.
I'm pretty sure this stat is referring to how many false rape accusers got charged. So now you are just making up numbers. You are either lying or grossly mistaken.

Vast majority of false rape accusations are made by Teenagers, Parents of Children, and the Homeless.
There's no way to know this. And there is also no citation.

55% of False Rape Accusations are in hopes of getting free medical treatment. Next major category is from teenagers justifying their absences to parents.
Did I miss the source for this. Why are you ignoring De Zutter (2017)?

tl;dr #metoo is a puritanical, sexist witchhunt that strips men of due process while refusing to hold women to the same standards, as per Asia Argento, Katy Perry, and Amber Heard. It's is a moral panic. Much like McCarthyism we will look back on #metoo with a deep sense of shame for vigilante mob justice conducted in the name of false rape accsusations.
submitted by Egalitarianwhistle to MensRights [link] [comments]

How to Win Big Cash in the UK Make Money Fast Spread Betting Strategies that Work - YouTube Point Spread Betting Explained: Sports Betting 101 - YouTube Spread Betting Strategies and Ideas Lesson 1: Spread Betting Trading Course - YouTube

Spread betting tax. Spread betting’s unique benefit is that it is exempt from both capital gains tax and stamp duty *. When compared to conventional share trading and CFD trading, spread betting is the only trading product to offer tax-free trading in the UK and Ireland. However, tax is not the only advantage spread betting has to offer, read ... Spread Betting shows a significant growth within the UK for the last years and is regulated speculative trading activity by FCA. Yet, spread betting concentrated mainly in the UK due to its legal authorization and even a tax break on profits, while many world countries forbid spread betting for various reasons. Thus, the broker provider should ... Spread betting is a tax-efficient way of speculating on the price movement of thousands of global financial instruments, including indices, shares, currency pairs, commodities and treasuries. It allows traders and investors to take a position on whether they think a market will rise or fall without having to buy or sell the underlying asset. Investing is a heavily regulated activity, so it makes perfect sense that the rules and regulations that govern investing in different countries would vary. A UK company called Cantor Index, for example, engages primarily in providing spread betting services. The same company operating in the United States would be considered illegal. What is spread betting,… In the UK, for example, HMRC deem spread betting tax-free. However, if spread betting is your sole income in 2017, you may find many countries deem it taxable. If you’re spread betting as non-UK residents, note regulations vary between Australia, India, Malaysia, Ireland, Singapore, Nigeria, Germany, Dubai, Greece, and New Zealand.

[index] [38478] [46288] [33463] [4593] [7390] [49458] [54692] [63902] [34307] [47242]

How to Win Big Cash in the UK Make Money Fast

Key Spread Betting Strategy 1: Start Small. http://www.financial-spread-betting.com/strategies/strategies-tips.html Clever Strategy : Generally you should st... How I made £50,000 Matched Betting UK MATCHED BETTING TUTORIAL - Duration: 10:31. Liam James Kay 351,609 ... 10 Legal Ways to Make Money Fast - Duration: 8:16. BRIGHT SIDE Recommended for ... Financial-Spread-Betting.com is where betting and finance meets, on the trading floor. This is a place where we can inform, and educate little, and hopefully... Established in 1974 as the world’s first financial spread betting firm, we’re now the world’s No.1 provider of CFDs and spread betting* and a global leader in forex. Learn how to bet ATS, or against the spread, with this informative breakdown. These Sports Betting 101 videos are meant to help you learn and start winning t...

https://forex-turck.fastmining.pw